[council] RE: Statements made during the GAC-GNSO meeting about the role of ICANN staff in the IGO small group

[Edward Morris]

Strong +1 to this. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 4 Nov 2016, at 16:31, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at Verisign.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks very much, Mary. I’m sure none of us assumed anything different, and I’m surprised the GAC Chair did.
>  
> Best,
> Keith
>  
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 6:46 AM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] Statements made during the GAC-GNSO meeting about the role of ICANN staff in the IGO small group
>  
> Dear Councilors,
>  
> Several statements were made during the GAC-GNSO meeting that just concluded, concerning my role and participation in the IGO small group discussions. I would like to let you know that I was only brought into the discussions after the group was formed, to provide subject matter expertise and process advice concerning the GNSO and its work. At no time did I participate other than as a staff facilitator – and I did not hold myself out as a representative of the GNSO, or as having any authority to negotiate on behalf of the GNSO Council or the GNSO community.
>  
> Mary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20161104/49cbadcc/attachment.html>