[council] Re: [council] [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

I agree as well. In the absence of any objections, I don’t see why we can’t send this to the board without having to vote on it. Asking the Board to send this to the PPSAI IRT seems like a solid idea to me.

Thanks.

Amr

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:47 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at TOAST.NET> wrote:
> 
> Hi James,
>  
> I completely support both the letter and 
>  
>  ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.  
>  
> your suggestion thereof. This is very time sensitive and will the rules presumably becoming live on December 1st (am I wrong here?) we're already playing catch up.
>  
> A big thanks to Darcy for your hard work on this. This is a very important issue and I'm grateful for your leadership on it.
>  
> Kind Regards,
>  
> Ed Morris
>  
>  
>  
> From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 AM
> To: "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>, "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
>  
> Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.
> 
> Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board.
>  
> Question for the Council:  are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial?  If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.  
>  
> Interested in hearing your thoughts.
>  
> Thanks—
>  
> J.
>  
>  
> From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41
> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
>  
> All,
>  
> Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting.
>  
> Best,
> Darcy
> __________
> Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
> M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
> 
> <Attachment 1>