[council] Preliminary planning for ICANN58

[Rubens Kuhl]

I would classify these 50 locations as being hubs (although not ICANN hubs):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_airports_by_passenger_traffic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_airports_by_passenger_traffic>

Let's see what that analysis would give for past and future meeting locations:
Nairobi - no
Brussels - no
Cartagena - no
San Francisco - yes
Singapore - yes
Dakar - no
San Jose(CR) - no
Prague - no
Toronto - yes
Beijing - yes
Durban - no
Buenos Aires - no
Singapore - yes
London - yes
Los Angeles - yes
Singapore - yes
Buenos Aires - no
Dublin - yes
Marrakech - no
Helsinki - no
Hyderabad - no
Copenhagen - no
Johannesburg - no (even though being the busiest airport in Africa)
Abu Dhabi - no (but Dubai is)
San Juan (PR) - no
Panama - no
Barcelona - yes


Note that Carlos is also suggesting an inversion: using AGM instead of Policy Forum to go where no ICANN'er has gone before. 

Rubens

> On Nov 26, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Carlos
> 
> Which locations would you see as being “hubs”?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Michele
> 
> 
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
> http://www.blacknight.host/
> http://blacknight.blog/
> http://ceo.hosting/
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
> Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20161126/cfe546e7/attachment.html>