[council] Board reply letter on IGO/RC issues and proposal on IGO acronyms protection from the IGO "small group"

[James M. Bladel]

Thanks, Mary –

Notwithstanding the existing discussions on this thread, could we ask Staff to send the Board formal acknowledgement of receipt of this letter, and a note that we plan to discuss at our next opportunity?

Thanks—

j.


From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Date: Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 16:02
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
Cc: Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at board.icann.org>, Chris Disspain <chris at disspain.uk>, "bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au" <bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>, Markus Kummer <markus.kummer at board.icann.org>, "Burr, Becky" <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>, "board-ops-team at icann.org" <board-ops-team at icann.org>
Subject: [council] Board reply letter on IGO/RC issues and proposal on IGO acronyms protection from the IGO "small group"

Dear Councilors,

Please find attached the ICANN Board’s reply to the GNSO Council’s letter of 31 May 2016 on the topic of protections for IGOs and the Red Cross. The letter also includes the final proposal on IGO acronyms protection that was worked on by the IGO “small group” of IGO, Board and GAC representatives, facilitated by ICANN staff as appropriate.

We will also transmit a copy of this to the co-chairs of the GNSO IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protections PDP Working Group and the GAC.

Best regards,
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong at icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20161007/3597c0b5/attachment.html>