[council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Wed Sep 28 23:48:28 UTC 2016

Hi Phil

Obviously I can’t speak for Akram, just noting comments he made during WSIS in May this year. It was reported by a number of media outlets:

http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=530dc4ad-6bd7-4969-8a41-ec538340c852
http://www.ip-watch.org/2016/05/03/icann-ceo-atallah-gearing-up-for-next-round-of-new-internet-domains/
http://domainincite.com/20856-next-new-gtld-round-could-start-sooner-than-expected

Thanks

Donna
From: Phil Corwin [mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:25 PM
To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>; James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>; Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>; GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org) <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: RE: [council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Donna:

Is there any explanation of how Akram arrived at his 2020 estimate? If there is I’d like to see it.

Barring unforeseen obstacles, my personal view is that the BC conditions could be met so as to permit a new round to open in the second half of 2018. The RPM Review WG projects submitting a final report in late 2017, my guesstimate is that the Subsequent Procedures WG will also finish by then, so the only remaining question is when the CCT-RT wraps up.

Once the WG recommendations are accepted by Council and the Board, and the CCT-RT findings duly digested, the Applicant Guidebook revisions and implementation of the recommendations can run concurrent with the application period. And I’d venture that the WG recommended adjustments will be more around the edges than major rewrites.

Best, Philip

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:51 PM
To: James M. Bladel; Emily Barabas; GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>)
Subject: RE: [council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

James, all

Unfortunately, I won’t be on the call on this week as I will be in transit. On the topic of ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures I want to reiterate something I suggested during a previous discussion by the Council. I believe that the Council should discuss the Board’s letter and the responses to date in the context of what is a reasonable timeframe for commencing the next application round.

Akram Atallah has suggested that there will not be another round before 2020, but is 8 years an acceptable period of time between processes, particularly given there was an expectation of a next round some 12 months after the 2012 round? Is it possible for the Council to identify what it believes is an acceptable period between when the new gTLD application process opened on 12 January 2012, to a subsequent process? Notwithstanding the diverging views about what is or isn’t on the critical path to a next round, is it within the realms of possibility that the requisite work could be finalized by the end of 2017, and a subsequent application round commenced on 1 June 2018?

I look forward to hearing the views of others.

Donna

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 8:22 AM
To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>; GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>) <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Thanks, Emily.  Third time’s a charm!  ☺

Councilors –

Please note the diversity (& divergent) views on this topic from the SGs and Cs, along with the statement of no consensus view from the PDP leadership.    Given the variety of positions and the desire to have a more comprehensive community-wide discussion in Hyderabad, I will propose that we convene a Drafting Team (assisted by Staff) to synthesize these documents in to a single GNSO statement, noting areas of agreement & difference where they exist.

Please keep this in mind for our call on Thursday if you would like to volunteer for this effort.

Thank you –

J.

From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:48
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Dear All,

Apologies, once again. This is the correct link: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Documents++-+29+September+2016<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_Documents-26-2343-3B-26-2343-3B-2D-26-2343-3B29-26-2343-3BSeptember-26-2343-3B2016&d=DQMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=yWRmF8AOfAD5wSNKVDt_tvvSbcMTu0OGDjJNQkhaK0g&s=pE2U_7ES14YDeN6O47w8CN2w95AHGH2JZG-tBprgYHY&e=>.

Kind regards,
Emily

From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday 27 September 2016 at 15:44
To: "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>)" <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Dear Councillors,

For documents related to the issue below, please use this updated link in place of the one in my previous message: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Documents+1+September+2016[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_Documents-26-2343-3B1-26-2343-3BSeptember-26-2343-3B2016&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=E8hHjeQ-92r0xOcQK2KuOL-wNkpOyMlLohZBef5Ncjk&s=MyJRyCs0KzdOjybNFQYdSVENyRSwPaHiIZQhdcdEeWc&e=>

Kind regards,
Emily

From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday 27 September 2016 at 15:11
To: "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>)" <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: [council] Summary of input received: ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Dear Councillors,

In the upcoming September 29th Council meeting, there will be a discussion regarding the ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures and community input on this letter.

Please find attached a draft document created by staff to facilitate the review of input on this topic received to date. A full list of documents related to this agenda item can be found on the wiki, including all input received to date: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Council+Meeting+2016-09-29[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsocouncilmeetings_GNSO-26-2343-3BCouncil-26-2343-3BMeeting-26-2343-3B2016-2D09-2D29&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=EAR96uGtPCU7pS6P3iq6ihMQvciofff9poCkEuXjr5c&s=1_0GasmhODsEjIJUl-yMOOaMjpW_cyJY-AY8tKeu6Q8&e=>.

We welcome any additional suggestions on ways staff can further support this review.

Kind regards,
Emily

Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com&d=DQMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=MY5px26ebWm2ot19Go90LSzrIiqoRrPvLDObQoL7ihM&s=SQL5bxW_1oclf93XUs5vMHPW8w7sdKPdW1-9X3lPsxA&e=>
Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4656/13076 - Release Date: 09/24/16
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160928/29831c7f/attachment.html>