[council] Fwd: Draft motion CCWG-IG

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Keith,

Thanks,
I do think that GNSO should also check with other chartering organizations
so we can synchronize any action. There was some discussion with ccNSO but
I don't think we had any with ALAC.

a longer deadline would be helpful and will allow the group to get more
input from the chartering organizations.
the motion talks about a new vehicle/structure (to be invented?) and
accountability mechanisms but doesn't indicate what will happen after GNSO
withdrawal. Getting clarity about the post-withdrawal process is needed and
that should be discussed with other chartering organizations.

Best,

Rafik

2017-07-06 23:14 GMT+09:00 Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org
>:

> Thanks Darcy.  I think the work to design the successor structure needs to
> take place between now and Abu Dhabi, but I take your point that the GNSO
> and other the chartering organizations may want to have involvement in that
> work, or at least an opportunity to review and provide feedback before
> things are finalized. What do others think?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> *From:* Darcy Southwell [mailto:darcy.southwell at endurance.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 6:17 PM
> *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> *Cc:* Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>;
> council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Fwd: Draft motion CCWG-IG
>
>
>
> Hi, Keith.  I definitely appreciate the time made available to coordinate
> a successor structure before GNSO withdrawal.  I think it’s critical that
> any attempts to create a new structure come with a deadline to do so.  Do
> you think the 3+ months between now and Abu Dhabi are sufficient to
> accomplish this?  I’m wondering if setting an ICANN61 deadline would be
> more appropriate. This would allow the Council to meet with the CCWG-IG and
> any other interested parties in Abu Dhabi to craft the successor framework.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darcy
>
>
>
> *From: *<council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <
> nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
> *Date: *Monday, July 3, 2017 at 12:41 PM
> *To: *"Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com>, "council at gnso.icann.org" <
> council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] Fwd: Draft motion CCWG-IG
>
>
>
> Dear Keith,
>
>
>
> The clean version of the motion has been posted on the corresponding page
> for the GNSO Council meeting on the 13th July 2017:
> https://community.icann.org/x/DWfwAw
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Nathalie
>
>
>
> *From: *<council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "
> council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Reply-To: *"kdrazek at verisign.com" <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> *Date: *Monday, July 3, 2017 at 5:13 PM
> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *[council] Fwd: Draft motion CCWG-IG
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As discussed in Johannesburg, attached is a draft motion on the CCWG-IG.
>
>
>
> As you'll see, it enables the group to coordinate with the other
> chartering organizations on a successor structure between now and Abu Dhabi
> while ensuring there is no gap in coverage.
>
>
>
> Happy to discuss further.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <Motion CCWG IG - 30 June 2017 .docx>
>
> _______________________________________________ council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170709/e3b057bf/attachment.html>