[council] [EXTERNAL] Re: Community travel support consultation - draft of proposed response

[Erika Mann]

Donna, All -
I'm in agreement with your approach. As Michele recommended in his last email, we can search for a different approach in expressing our concern concerning certain aspects of the Fellowship program.

Kind regards,
Erika 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 18, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at team.neustar> wrote:
> 
> Erika, all
>  
> I have a fundamental problem with the Council calling out any program or recipients of any ICANN funded travel for special scrutiny in our comments. I could provide a long-list of problems that I have with certain groups that receive travel funding that go beyond those that are listed.  If individual SGs and Cs want to make such comments they are free to do so, but I do not think it is the Council’s place to do so.
>  
> I think ICANN is headed down a good path in reviewing the Travel Guidelines and we should be supportive of that. A more reasonable approach at this time might be to make some high level observations.
>  
> I have made some changes to the doc to include more detail about Council travel support initiatives.
>  
> Donna
>  
> From: council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Erika Mann
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 12:13 PM
> To: Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
> Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org; GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Community travel support consultation - draft of proposed response
>  
> Tatiana, Michele, Ayden - 
> 
> 
> Thanks for the work!
> 
> 
> How about mentioning that there's concern that the Fellowship Program is not sufficiently focusing on ICANN issues? I made a recommendation below. If you don't like it, change it or don't include it. Both is fine with me. 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Erika 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You are welcome to append any general comments on the community resource consultation
> We would like to point out that the document contains no questions related to such programs as the ICANN fellowship, NextGen at ICANN, and pilot communityonboarding program. ICANN travel reports show that many of the travelers who ICANN supports with travel funding participate in these programs. The costs of these programs for ICANN are quite high compared to AC/SO travel expenses. The value and effectiveness of these programs are, however, unclear to many of the community members. 
> 
> 
> EM - recommendation to add:  "There's growing concern that the program is not sufficiently focusing on ICANN matters."
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 17, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> Michele, Ayden and I reviewed the Community Travel Support Consultation Questionnaire and drafted a proposed response from the GNSO Council perspective. Please find the document attached.
>  
> The deadline for submission of this response is actually today, but we asked for a few days of extension. If you could review the document and provide your feedback until Monday COB (whatever timezone COB is for you), it would be greatly appreciated. If you need more time - please let me (us) know. Thanks! 
>  
> Cheers,
> Tanya 
> <Community Travel Support Consultation 17 Nov 2017.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
> <Community Travel Support Consultation 17 Nov 2017_DA.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20171119/0513c2a1/attachment.html>