[council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation

Fri Feb 2 14:27:55 UTC 2018

+1 to Michele.
Can't see any difficulties agreeing on such a statement on the GNSO Council
level -- unless, of course, someone is against fiscal prudence and clear
KPIs and ROI.
Cheers,
Tanya

On 2 February 2018 at 06:21, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <
michele at blacknight.com> wrote:

> Arsene
>
>
>
> A high level statement that urges ICANN to:
>
>    - Be fiscally prudent
>    - Track ROI and have clear KPIs
>
> Is something that we should be able to agree on.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Michele
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
> https://www.blacknight.com/
>
> https://blacknight.blog/
>
> https://ceo.hosting/
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072 <+353%2059%20918%203072>
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 <+353%2059%20918%203090>
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
>
> Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Arsène
> Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07
> *To: *"mpsilvavalent at gmail.com" <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>
>
> *Cc: *GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship
> Program Community Consultation
>
>
>
> Martin, Ayden,
>
> I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational
> email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of
> the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in
> the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and
> start an email thread, if you wish so.
>
> As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but
> would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on
> our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting
> together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from
> having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even
> inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on
> a joint statement.
>
> Regards,
>
> Arsene
>
>
> ------------------------
> **Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
>
> Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international*
> <http://www.rudiinternational.org>,
> CEO, *Smart Services Sarl* <http://www.smart-serv.info>, *Mabingwa Forum*
> <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com>
> Tel: +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967>
>
> GPG: 523644A0
>
> *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*
>
> 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow
> <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html>
> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil
> <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors>
> & Mexico
> <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>)
> - AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger
> <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN's GNSO Council
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm> Member. AFRINIC Fellow
> (Mauritius
> <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners>
> )* - *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance -
> Internet Freedom.
>
> Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report (English
> <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French
> <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>)
>
>
>
> 2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
> mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>:
>
> I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the
> Council if they were needed.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this
> letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's
> views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising
> budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the
> need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of
> bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO
> Council.
>
>
>
> — Ayden
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points
> and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be
> good if we make the point.
>
> SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as
> we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short
> and concise comment.
>
> Tanya
>
>
>
> On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be> wrote:
>
> Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to
> comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points
> (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and
> fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
>
> Marie
>
>
>
> *From:* council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather
> Forrest
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM
> *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship
> Program Community Consultation
>
>
>
> Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
>
>
>
>  I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the
> "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now
> have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation
> documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental
> improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment
> opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to
> leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their
> communities.   If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for
> Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in
> here and say so.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Heather,
>
>
>
> if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since
> some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead
> the effort.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Rafik
>
> 2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>:
>
> Dear Council colleagues,
>
>
>
> I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during
> our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> From: *David Olive* <david.olive at icann.org>
>
> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM
>
> Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community
> Consultation
>
> To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org>
>
> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton at icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj <
> ergys.ramaj at icann.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Community Leaders:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to
> help inform its future direction.
>
>
>
> The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a
> breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other
> details about the consultation process.
>
>
>
> We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this
> process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about
> the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or
> remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire
> should be sent to fellowshipconsultation at icann.org by 30 March 2018.
>
>
>
> Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group
> is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Ergys Ramaj
> Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list
>
> So-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> council mailing list
>
> council at gnso.icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> council mailing list
>
> council at gnso.icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180202/b5c704ca/attachment.html>