[council] [Ext] Options to adjust timeline for specific and organisational reviews

Sat Jul 28 00:44:44 UTC 2018

Hi Donna,

thanks for the draft. I have some comments asking for clarifications:
- "in terms of letting the independent expert (or  ̈coach ̈) to work in
parallel with Working Party Team (or even the respective SO/AC Leadership)
and collaborate towards a forward looking work strategy, instead of looking
for and fixing past mistakes". I am not sure how this can work in practice
or what can achieve. it is unclear to me what is the role of the
independent expert in such context. can you please elaborate more?
the deliverable of independent examiner of latest organizational reviews
for the different SO/AC were of variable quality and scope.
- I see that SO/AC leadership will be responsible for the organization
review. but is it possible to know more what is the role description other
than initiating and/or managing the budget? is the leadership will be
tasked to set the terms for the reviews (as it was mentioned we don't have
yet the operating standards yet). what is the relation vis-a-vis the
working party?
- for benchmarking, it is a good idea but I guess it will be only effective
if all organizational reviews are done in a similar way which I don't think
it is the case now. it will also need more work on metrics or criteria to
be agreed on for testing against and benchmark.

Best,

Rafik

Le sam. 28 juil. 2018 à 01:18, Austin, Donna via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> a écrit :

> Thanks Julie, and thanks to the GNSO Review Working Group for their input.
>
>
>
> All the comment period closes on 31 July, so comments or concerns should
> be raised today if at all possible.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 27, 2018 6:39 AM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Cc:* Carlos Raul <carlosraulg at gmail.com>; Austin, Donna
> <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ext] Options to adjust timeline for specific and
> organisational reviews
>
>
>
> Dear GNSO Council members,
>
>
>
> Further to Donna’s message below, on behalf of the GNSO Review Working
> Group (WG) please see the attached revised version of the draft response.
> The comments from the WG appear at the bottom of page 3 and continue on the
> top of page 4.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> *From: *"Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:45 PM
> *To: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Cc: *Carlos Raul <carlosraulg at gmail.com>, Julie Hedlund <
> julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Options to adjust timeline for specific and
> organisational reviews
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues
>
>
>
> On behalf of Carlos and I, please find attached for your consideration,
> our proposed draft response to ICANN’s Long-Term Options to Adjust the
> Timeline of Reviews that was posted for public comment until 31 July 2018.
>
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reviews-long-term-timeline-2018-05-14-en
> [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_reviews-2Dlong-2Dterm-2Dtimeline-2D2018-2D05-2D14-2Den&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=WndtysIyhi_Eh-WkTzHsgfrB91JSBAg8XGbNppJSweo&s=haxmeO9jH5FoHzoCGn-1JdODnVmwt8yWxzPDnVuZv2Q&e=>
>
>
>
> Please note that I have also asked Julie Hedlund to share the proposed
> comments with the GNSO Review Team for consideration. As most of you know,
> the Review Team is finalizing what has been a 4+ years effort, and I
> believe it would be timely to be able to capture any comments they may wish
> to make regarding Organisational Reviews. The Review Team is meeting
> tomorrow and we hope to have comments back from them by Friday.
>
>
>
> With regard to the Short Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific
> Reviews, please consider the options available at the following link and
> respond to the list regarding preferences.
>
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-fillable-form-06jun18-en.pdf
> [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_specific-2Dreviews-2Dshort-2Dterm-2Dtimeline-2Dfillable-2Dform-2D06jun18-2Den.pdf&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=WndtysIyhi_Eh-WkTzHsgfrB91JSBAg8XGbNppJSweo&s=Yuk3c1yp-cMms72QgTigHTIWVSHueUU4gd0q3eKiHgc&e=>
>
>
>
> I suspect that it may not be possible for the Council to submit a comment
> on the Short-Term Options as I am already aware that the RySG will be
> supporting Option B, which is at odds with the views expressed by Ayden
> during out last Council call.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Donna
>
> *Donna Austin*
> *Neustar, Inc.* / Senior Policy Manager, Registry Solutions
> *Mobile:* +1 310 890 9655
> *donna.austin at team.neustar <donna.austin at team.neustar>* / *Website:*
> home.neustar [home.neustar]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.home.neustar_&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=WndtysIyhi_Eh-WkTzHsgfrB91JSBAg8XGbNppJSweo&s=poL08Sf6pF5_f54ctWgSyPD9OXw7jy0cZrn0M8wSJJI&e=>
>
>
>
> *Follow Neustar:* LinkedIn [linkedin.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_5349&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=WndtysIyhi_Eh-WkTzHsgfrB91JSBAg8XGbNppJSweo&s=Gds0ikOCHzXuB2JRYBCUEDtcotLrwKPGE8DYhUDQG_s&e=>
> */* Twitter [twitter.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.twitter.com_neustar&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=WndtysIyhi_Eh-WkTzHsgfrB91JSBAg8XGbNppJSweo&s=nPpIX33kiVoKLXP-rhqOgfsbXLSdwGfPoKxn9Pc5hoc&e=>
> Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this email message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this email message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180728/627ec299/attachment.html>