[council] Board process for GAC Advice

[Johan Helsingius]

Likewise!

	Julf

On 08-03-18 23:58, Erika Mann wrote:
> Heather - I agree with Rubens and Carlos. 
> Cheers,
> Erika 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:03 PM, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg at isoc-cr.org
> <mailto:crg at isoc-cr.org>> wrote:
> 
>> I think we should consider both Heather!
>>
>> I think Rubens first suggestion on a GNSO comment, in view of the new
>> early engagement of the GAC in the GNSO process, is valid on its own
>> for GNSO derived policies. Even if its only for future cases, the
>> Board should consider in its evaluation phase if a GNSO policy issue
>> has already been discussed between GAC and the GNSO in previous stages.
>>
>> Then, of course, your suggestion to ask other SO/ACs should be pursued
>> ASAP.
>>
>> Safe travels to all
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter
>> skype carlos.raulg
>> +506 8837 7176 
>> ________
>> Apartado 1571-1000
>> COSTA RICA
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Heather Forrest
>> <haforrestesq at gmail.com <mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thank you, Rubens. I wasn't aware of this- anyone else?
>>
>>     If you all agree, I think this would be a worthwhile thing to
>>     raise when I meet with the other SOAC chairs tomorrow.
>>
>>     Best wishes,
>>     Heather
>>
>>     On 08/03/2018 4:47 PM, "Rubens Kuhl" <rubensk at nic.br
>>     <mailto:rubensk at nic.br>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         It seems that Board decided to detail how they plan to handle
>>         GAC advice:
>>         https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gac-advice-process-handbook-06mar18-en.pdf
>>         <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gac-advice-process-handbook-06mar18-en.pdf>
>>
>>         As another registry mentioned, "Curious how there is nothing
>>         in the new process about consulting the rest of the community
>>         if the GAC Advice overlaps with, is inconsistent with, or
>>         otherwise also falls into the jurisdiction of, other SOs or ACs."
>>         That lacks, for instance, the usual comments from GNSO
>>         regarding advice overlapping with GNSO Policy, either existent
>>         or in the pipeline. 
>>
>>         Do we want to make a GNSO Council comment ? Or perhaps
>>         including other SOs and ACs ? 
>>
>>
>>         Rubens
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         council mailing list
>>         council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>         <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     council mailing list
>>     council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> council mailing list
>> council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>