[council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget
McGrady, Paul D.
PMcGrady at winston.com
Mon Nov 12 14:33:34 UTC 2018
Thanks Ayden. This change looks good to me.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com<mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
Please find attached a proposed revision to the Council's comment on the FY20 IANA/PTI Budget.
We should change this sentence:
The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.
The GNSO Council notes that one of our current policy development activities does potentially intersect with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI. The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group is currently developing Policy that may ultimately instruct IANA to place new TLDs into the root. However, it is not anticipated that delegation would occur in FY20.
If there are any concerns with the attached comment being submitted today, can you please advise so on the mailing list by 18:00 UTC today. Thank you.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, 9 November 2018 17:04, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at winston.com<mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com>> wrote:
I have set this to the IPC for any comments. However, can you please clarify what is meant by “The GNSO Council notes that its current priorities and policy development activities do not appear to intersect directly with the operations of the IANA Functions by PTI.” Seems to me that the Subsequent Procedures PDP is working on Policy related to a process which ultimately instructs IANA to put new TLDs in the root, so I’m not sure that the statement is accurate. Is there a way to clarify what was meant by this sentence? Thanks!
From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Ayden Férdeline
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 9:08 AM
To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com<mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council comment on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI Budget
Just a friendly reminder; the attached comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council this coming Monday, unless an objection is raised. (The only further edit that would be made would be to remove the 'draft' watermark from the document.) Thank you.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 11:00, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com<mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
On behalf of the Council's Standing Committee on Budget and Operations, please find attached a comment that we have prepared on the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget.
We are seeking to submit this comment on behalf of the Council on 12 November 2018, absent any objections from a member of the Council.
With apologies for not getting this into your inbox sooner, can you please review the attached document as a matter of urgency. Thank you very much.
The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.
<FY20 IANA-PTI Proposed OpPlan Budget - GNSO Draft Comments_v0.4 - AF edits.docx>
More information about the council