[council] Updated PDP3.0 report

[Marie Pattullo]

Thanks so much Heather.

We didn’t get to #7 but may I please ask a basic question: why is it there? It didn’t have any support in our discussions to date so I’m a bit confused as to why the report says that it is “proposed to be further developed and considered by the GNSO Council for potential adoption in the near term”.

I’m worried that putting out this idea of the “Creation of Cooperative Teams” as a potential “improvement” could suggest to the community that if you don’t/can’t/won’t engage in a PDP, that’s OK as the most active/engaged/involved members will double their own hours by synthesising and explaining things to you. I’d rather pass the message that being a WG member comes with the personal responsibility to, well, do the “work” part.

Sorry if I have totally misunderstood this!

M

From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Heather Forrest
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 11:13 AM
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>; gnso-SECS <gnso-secs at icann.org>
Subject: [council] Updated PDP3.0 report

Dear colleagues,

Please find attached a revised version of the PDP3.0 report (in clean and redline versions) that incorporates our discussions this morning.

Best wishes,

Heather
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20181021/d60c32d5/attachment.html>