[council] Updated PDP3.0 report

Heather Forrest haforrestesq at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 11:22:32 UTC 2018


Thanks Darcy and Marie. Any objections to Marie's proposal, as agreed by
Darcy?

Best wishes,

Heather

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:47 PM Darcy Southwell <
darcy.southwell at endurance.com> wrote:

> Agree about ending the sentence with “Council.”
>
> Sent from Darcy's iPhone. Please excuse errors.
>
> On Oct 22, 2018, at 12:01, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be> wrote:
>
> Thanks Darcy. Could we also stop the sentence at “Council”? I think the
> reference to “potential adoption in the near term” gives the impression
> that we are still actively considering implementing these proposals, and
> soon. I don’t want to give the community the idea that they can sign up for
> several PDPs as they will be able to count on someone else to do the work
> for them.
>
> Also, with the full table of proposals it’s not so clear that the 3 are
> not part of the agreed way forward. Could we separate them out and put them
> at the end under a different heading, with the same wording:
>
>
>
> “The following improvements, which have varying degrees of support from
> the full Council, are proposed for further consideration and possible
> development by the GNSO Council”?
>
>
>
> Thanks all
>
>
>
> Marie
>
>
>
> *From:* council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Darcy
> Southwell
> *Sent:* Monday, October 22, 2018 11:37 AM
> *To:* 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq at gmail.com>; 'Michele Neylon ::
> Blacknight' <michele at blacknight.com>
> *Cc:* 'gnso-SECS' <gnso-secs at icann.org>; 'GNSO Council List' <
> council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Updated PDP3.0 report
>
>
>
> Thank you, Heather.  I recommend modifying this:
>
>
>
> "The following improvements, which have varying degrees of support from
> the full Council, are proposed to be further developed and considered by
> the GNSO Council for potential adoption in the near term:"
>
>
>
> to the following:
>
>
>
> "The following improvements, which have varying degrees of support from
> the full Council, are proposed *for further consideration and possible
> development to be further developed and considered* by the GNSO Council
> for potential adoption in the near term:"
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darcy
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Heather
> Forrest
> *Sent:* Monday, October 22, 2018 10:26 AM
> *To:* Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com>
> *Cc:* gnso-SECS <gnso-secs at icann.org>; GNSO Council List <
> council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Updated PDP3.0 report
>
>
>
> Dear Darcy, Marie, Michele, all,
>
>
>
> Responding to your concerns on improvements 7, 8 and 10 which did not have
> in principle support, as well as the other suggestions captured in the
> submissions of Phil Corwin and Petter Rindforth and others that add further
> improvements than those we had initially put out for comment.
>
>
>
> As I noted at the end of our working session yesterday, the Executive
> Summary sets out the following to differentiate improvements with support
> from those for further discussion. If you have any concerns about this
> language or suggestions to make it more clear that 7, 8 and 10 are not in,
> please weigh in before Tuesday evening.
>
>
>
> The following improvements, which have support from the full Council, are
> proposed to the GNSO Council for its immediate adoption:
>
>  *Improvement #1: Terms of participation for WG members*
>
> *Improvement #2: Consider alternatives to open WG model*
>
> *Improvement #3: Criteria for joining of new members after a PDP WG’s
> formation*
>
> *Improvement #4: Capture vs. Consensus Playbook*
>
> *Improvement #5: Active role for and clear description of Council liaison
> to PDP WGs*
>
> *Improvement #6: Document expectations for WG leaders that outlines role &
> responsibilities as well as minimum skills / expertise required*
>
> *Improvement #9: Provide further guidance for section 3.6 (Standard
> Methodology for Decision Making)*
>
> *Improvement #11: Enforce deadlines and ensure bite size pieces*
>
> *Improvement #12: Notification to Council of changes in work plan*
>
> *Improvement #13: Review of Chair(s)*
>
> *Improvement #14: Make better use of existing flexibility in PDP to allow
> for data gathering, chartering and termination when it is clear that no
> consensus can be achieved*
>
> *Improvement #15: Independent conflict resolution*
>
> *Improvement #16: Criteria for PDP WG Updates*
>
> *Improvement #17: Resource reporting for PDP WGs*
>
>  It is intended that, following adoption by the GNSO Council, the Council
> will further develop and take action on the proposed implementation
> strategies documented here.
>
> The following improvements, which have varying degrees of support from the
> full Council, are proposed to be further developed and considered by the
> GNSO Council for potential adoption in the near term:
>
>  *Improvement #7: Creation of Cooperative Teams*
>
> *Improvement #8: PDP Plenary or Model *
>
> *Improvement #10: Document positions at the outset*
>
> Additional proposed improvements stemming from comments received during
> consultations of these recommendations which are documented in this report
> should be considered alongside these three improvements.
>
>
>
> The GNSO Council acknowledges and wishes to thank all those who have
> contributed to this initial phase of the GNSO PDP 3.0 Project.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:36 PM Michele Neylon - Blacknight <
> michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>
> I think there are a few items that need to be further explored and
> developed, so we shouldn’t be voting on blank items but maybe recommending
> further work?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
> https://www.blacknight.com/
>
> http://blacknight.blog/
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
>
> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Marie
> Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be>
> *Date: *Sunday 21 October 2018 at 11:53
> *To: *Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, GNSO Council List <
> council at gnso.icann.org>, "gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] Updated PDP3.0 report
>
>
>
> Thanks so much Heather.
>
>
>
> We didn’t get to #7 but may I please ask a basic question: why is it
> there? It didn’t have any support in our discussions to date so I’m a bit
> confused as to why the report says that it is “proposed to be further
> developed and considered by the GNSO Council for potential adoption in the
> near term”.
>
>
>
> I’m worried that putting out this idea of the “Creation of Cooperative
> Teams” as a potential “improvement” could suggest to the community that if
> you don’t/can’t/won’t engage in a PDP, that’s OK as the most
> active/engaged/involved members will double their own hours by synthesising
> and explaining things to you. I’d rather pass the message that being a WG
> member comes with the personal responsibility to, well, do the “work” part.
>
>
>
> Sorry if I have totally misunderstood this!
>
>
>
> M
>
>
>
> *From:* council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Heather
> Forrest
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 21, 2018 11:13 AM
> *To:* GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>; gnso-SECS <
> gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [council] Updated PDP3.0 report
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
>
>
> Please find attached a revised version of the PDP3.0 report (in clean and
> redline versions) that incorporates our discussions this morning.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20181022/866d255f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the council mailing list