[council] EPDP & Accreditation/Access Model

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 00:01:43 UTC 2018


Hi Darcy,

while the letter was shared in the mailing list by EPDP team member this
week, there was no discussion or reaction on that matter within the EPDP
team.

Best,

Rafik

Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 03:07, Darcy Southwell <
darcy.southwell at endurance.com> a écrit :

> Rafik, as Council liaison to the EPDP, what can you share about the impact
> the EPDP Team sees here?
>
>
>
> Darcy
>
>
>
> *From:* Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 18, 2018 8:11 AM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* EPDP & Accreditation/Access Model
>
>
>
> The BC/IPC recently sent a letter to ICANN org (
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/bc-ipc-to-marby-07sep18-en.pdf)
> about the accreditation and access model.  This letter seems problematic at
> this stage of the game.  We discussed this issue ad nauseam during the EPDP
> Charter development and the Council has tasked the EPDP with addressing the
> Annex. To ask ICANN org to circumvent the EPDP undermines the policy
> development process and seems disingenuous to the Council’s approval of the
> Charter.  In addition, the EDPB’s July 5 letter states responsibility for
> designing an access model lies with ICANN *and* the
> registries/registrars, not just ICANN as indicated in the BC/IPC letter.
>
>
>
> Will our BC and/or IPC councilors please shed some light on this?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darcy
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180920/b5d21972/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list