[council] ICANN's Legislative/Regulatory Tracker -- Recommended Improvements

Michele Neylon - Blacknight michele at blacknight.com
Thu Apr 11 09:44:15 UTC 2019


Erika

Sure, but I think the point Carlos was trying to make is that we and ICANN should be leveraging the resources we already have. The GAC should be one.

Regards

Michele


--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com>
Date: Thursday 11 April 2019 at 10:30
To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul at gutierrez.se>
Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>, "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org)" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] ICANN's Legislative/Regulatory Tracker -- Recommended Improvements

I don't mind Carlos, but keep in mind, DNA related legislative challenges are often embedded in legislation that don't appear to carry such risks.
Erika

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:59 PM Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul at gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul at gutierrez.se>> wrote:
Let's start with a short survey to all GAC participants during ICANN65,  to test their level of involvement with their local legislation relating to the DNS. We may get some leads.....
Thanks! Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

El 10 abr. 2019 7:27, Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com<mailto:erika at erikamann.com>> escribió:
Carlos - we can add the GAC to the list as an important partner but I doubt many will be able in alerting ICANN about potentially problematic legislations they're or their parliaments are drafting. In many cases they will not even know. For example, I'm doubtful that the European Parliament, the European Commission or European Member States are aware about potentially - for the domain sector - problematic aspects of the copyright law they recently all supported.
Erika

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:26 PM Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul at gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul at gutierrez.se>> wrote:
A lot of good ideas but I don't see the GAC in any of those. The most probable source or shapping force of any initiative that may be closely related and affect the DNS is sitting in the next room at every meeting. What about asking them?
Thanks! Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

El 10 abr. 2019 4:01, Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com<mailto:erika at erikamann.com>> escribió:
Keith, All -

I believe the current format and information gathering practice (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/legislative-regulatory-30jan19-en.pdf)  is not sufficient and would therefore recommend few things:

  *   ICANN ORG should work with a professional firm in receiving regular updates (monitoring report) about regulatory issues that cause concern
·

     *   To make such a Monitoring Report (MR) not too expensive
o

        *   ICANN should focus on few regions, regions that cause the majority of concerns
        *   Monitoring reports should be received 4 times/year
        *   Early warning notes should be received as quickly as possible

  *   The current Crowed Sourced Tracking Report should remain as an additional information source https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/legislative-regulatory-30jan19-en.pdf
  *   I agree with Paul that it is key "CANN’s government relations folks to visit us at Council and highlight the main issues it sees heading our way"
  *   I agree with Flip, the list of topics that should be monitored need to be broadened
  *   I agree with Ayden to some degree but recommend to focus on few aspect "ICANN should monitor 1) the impact the law/regulation/directive has had as it relates to ICANN's remit" and, once a legislation is introduced, ICANN must do a compliance assessment. I don't believe that lobbying strategies should be broadly discussed in the community.
  *   I agree with Martin, the Crowed Sourced Tracking Report should cooperate with existing Regional Intelligence Tracking Reports.
Kind regards,
Erika


On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:35 PM Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>> wrote:

Ayden, Darcy, Erika, Flip, Michele, Phillipe and Tatiana:



During our GNSO Working Session in Kobe, the seven of you volunteered to help develop GNSO Council recommendations for improvements to ICANN’s current Legislative/Regulatory tracking effort.



As we discussed, ICANN’s work in this area is relatively new and still evolving, and we have an opportunity to engage with Theresa’s group to help shape their approach to ensure it is applicable to our policy work and process management responsibilities. While their work product is currently a spreadsheet, I recall we agreed it needs to go much deeper in analysis and demonstrate a predictive capability for where future or existing regulations impact GNSO policies, in effect now or under future development.



Please work together and with Staff to help kick off this important and timely work.



Thanks,

Keith








_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190411/a64bc7a8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the council mailing list