[council] FW: Draft GNSO Council Response to ICANN on PPSAI Implementation and IRTP

Tue Apr 16 16:17:23 UTC 2019

Dear Keith,
Dear all,

I do not know if the letter has already been sent.

If not, please find attached the draft PPSAI letter with suggested edits from the IPC, providing further factual background.

Please let us know should you have any comments or questions.

Best regards,

Flip

Flip Petillion
fpetillion at petillion.law<mailto:fpetillion at petillion.law>
+32484652653
www.petillion.law<http://www.petillion.law/>

[Petillion_Logo_Zwart_600px]<http://www.petillion.law/>

  Attorneys – Advocaten – Avocats

________________________________
From: councilOn Behalf OfDrazek, Keith via council
Sent: 11 April 2019 16:04:37 (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris
To: marie.pattullo at aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be>; darcy.southwell at endurance.com<mailto:darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>; council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Response to ICANN on PPSAI Implementation and IRTP
Hi Marie,

Thanks very much for the clarifying questions.

  1.  Yes, the letter essentially acknowledges the differences of opinion on timing and the role of ICANN Org in managing implementation work, and defers that decision to ICANN Org.

  1.  The following language in the letter was intended to address the “parsing” point we discussed in Kobe. It does not use the work “parse” but I think the intention is the same:

“As discussed during the GNSO Council meetings in Kobe, the Council notes that a detailed analysis on elements of the implementation work that are impacted by GDPR and interdependent with the EPDP outcome would be helpful to the Council and the GNSO community and encourages ICANN org to carry out such analysis as soon as possible.”

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Best,
Keith

From: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be>>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 6:43 AM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com<mailto:darcy.southwell at endurance.com>>; Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>>
Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>; council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [council] Draft GNSO Council Response to ICANN on PPSAI Implementation and IRTP

Many thanks, Keith.

Can I please clarify, does “... the GNSO Council considers it appropriate to defer the decision on this issue to ICANN org and the PPSAI IRT” mean that we’re leaving it to Org and the IRT to decide on whether to start the implementation?

Also – may I ask what happened to the suggestion about parsing – lifted from the Kobe action points, “In relation to unpausing of the PPSAI IRT, Council to consider whether it would be possible to parse out EPDP-dependent versus non-EPDP dependent items.”?

Thanks!

Marie

From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 1:59 AM
To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>>
Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>; council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Response to ICANN on PPSAI Implementation and IRTP

Thank you, Keith.  The RrSG has reviewed the letter and has no additional comments or objections.

Thanks,
Darcy

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:11 AM Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>> wrote:
Hi all,

Attached is a draft Council response to the 4 March 2019 letter we received from Cyrus concerning PPSAI Implementation and related IRTP issues.

Here’s the link to Cyrus’ letter: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/namazi-to-drazek-et-al-04mar19-en.pdf

The attached draft acknowledges and refers to the discussion we had in Kobe on the topic and recognizes the differing views of Councilors.  Thanks to Pam for taking the lead on drafting this. Rafik and I have both reviewed and provided our input.

Please review and advise if you have any comments. I’d like to be able to send this sooner rather than later.

Best,
Keith

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190416/b4654c16/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11899 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190416/b4654c16/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft Letter_ Council to ICANN org re PPSAI Implementaton  Transfer Issues -- Draft 12-april-2019 - IPC edit.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 26664 bytes
Desc: Draft Letter_ Council to ICANN org re PPSAI Implementaton  Transfer Issues -- Draft 12-april-2019 - IPC edit.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190416/b4654c16/DraftLetter_CounciltoICANNorgrePPSAIImplementatonTransferIssues--Draft12-april-2019-IPCedit-0001.docx>