[council] FW: NomComRIWG: Outreach questions

Tue Dec 17 02:06:36 UTC 2019

Dear Keith:
Please mark me down for the small team for this.

Kind regards,
Carlton

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, 8:21 am Drazek, Keith via council, <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Please see the email below from the NomCom Review Implementation Working
> Group. They have posed a set of questions to the GNSO Council, with a
> response deadline of January 31. I suggest we form a small team to
> coordinate the Council’s answers and reply. If anyone would like to
> volunteer, please let me know.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> *From:* Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 13, 2019 8:13 AM
> *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>; pam.little at alibaba-inc.com;
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> *Cc:* Tom Barrett <tbarrett at encirca.com>; Cheryl Langdon-Orr <
> langdonorr at gmail.com>; Zahid Jamil-IG <internet at jamilandjamil.com>; Lars
> Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>; Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>;
> gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] NomComRIWG: Outreach questions
>
>
>
> Dear Keith, Dear Pam, Dear Rafik,
>
>
>
> As the leaders of the NomCom Review Implementation Working Group
> (NomComRIWG), we are contacting you following the ICANN Board’s
> acceptance of our Detailed Implementation Plan
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-11-07-en#2.b>.
> The NomComRIWG has been directed to commence implementation of the
> twenty-seven (27) recommendations, and we are seeking the GNSO Council’s
> responses to a number of questions via the following google form:
> https://forms.gle/vrs95jrp9akK5sSRA *by 31 January 2020*. Feel free to
> also seek input from the GNSO Council’s supporting staff if you believe
> this might add value to the implementation. If we have not received the
> GNSO Council’s response or a request for an extension by the deadline, we
> will proceed with the implementation without your input.
>
>
>
> If you prefer, feel free to respond separately to individual questions
> that you are able to answer, rather than wait until you are able to answer
> all of the questions at once.
>
>
>
> Please note this is the first round of several outreaches, we will be
> continuously outreaching to you throughout the implementation phase (over
> the next twenty-four to thirty-six months) due to the nature of this
> review. In particular, many members of the NomComRIWG will attend ICANN67
> and plan to hold an update session for the entire community. If your group
> has time on your internal agenda and would like to meet with us for a short
> in-person update, do not hesitate to reach out to us via
> mssi-secretariat at icann.org and we will happily coordinate. Finally, if
> you have any questions or concerns, either about the questions, or about
> any other aspect of the NomCom Review implementation, please, do not
> hesitate to reach out to us.
>
>
>
> Many thanks and best wishes,
>
>
>
> Tom Barrett, Chair NomComRIWG
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Vice-Chair NomComRIWG
>
> Zahid Jamal, Vice-Chair NomComRIWG
>
>
>
> NomComRIWG wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/aBpIBg
>
> Detailed Implementation Plan: PDF
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom-implementation-plan-15sep19-en.pdf>
>
>
>
> *Rec. 14: Formalize communication between the NomCom and the Board,
> SOs/ACs, and the PTI Board to understand needed competencies and
> experience.*
>
>
>
>    - Is there additional information that could be shared between the
>    NomCom and the GNSO so that the NomCom can better target its selection to
>    the needs of the GNSO Council?
>
>
>
> *Rec. 16:* *Implement and codify a system for providing feedback to the
> NomCom regarding the contributions and participation of members up for
> re-appointment by the NomCom.*
>
>
>
>    - What information do you currently share with the NomCom about its
>    NomCom appointees, and what is the timing of these communications?
>
>
>
>    - In your opinion, what additional information should be shared
>    between you and the NomCom?
>
>
>
>
>
> *Rec. 21: The NomCom should use a standardized tool to evaluate and
> prioritize candidates, based on desired competencies and experience as
> determined annually. This tool will not replace qualitative assessments of
> candidates.*
>
>
>
>    - In your opinion, what tools, assessments and skills analysis should
>    be used by the NomCom to make the best possible selection.
>
>
>
> *Rec. 22: The NomCom should provide consistent interview questions and an
> interviewer evaluation form for the candidates interviewed during the
> deep-dive phase and the final face-to-face interviews.*
>
>
>
>    - In your opinion, which questions should be part of the "interview
>    question library" and which would then be used by every NomCom?
>
>
>
> *Rec. 25: Improve NomCom selection decisions by assessing the performance
> and needs of all bodies receiving NomCom appointees.*
>
>
>
>    - Is the GNSO Council performing any self-assessments, or third-party
>    assessments?
>
>
>
>    - If yes, are there any identified skills needed for future NomCom
>    appointees to your organization?
>
>
>
>    - If applicable, how do you communicate this to the NomCom?
>
>
>
>    - What performance assessment, if any, do you think is feasible by the
>    GNSO Council to improve future NomCom selection decisions.
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20191216/b3b128ce/attachment-0001.html>