[council] For your review - Final EPDP Report AND Council Motion

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 21:39:08 UTC 2019


Hi Keith,

thanks for seconding the motion, I accept those edits as friendly
amendments.

Best Regards,

Rafik

Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 06:29, Drazek, Keith via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Following up Marika’s note forwarding the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report,
> I have attached a slightly updated version of the draft motion for our
> consideration during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting. I happily second this
> motion put forward by Rafik, and I look forward to our discussion and
> possible vote tomorrow.
>
>
>
> As I have described previously, the motion includes approval of the EPDP
> WG Phase One Final Report AND Council non-objection to the initiation of
> Phase 2. Note that a deferral of tomorrow’s vote to 4 March, as requested
> today by Marie, would delay initiation of Phase 2 by a commensurate period,
> i.e. 10 days.
>
>
>
> Please review the attached motion before tomorrow’s meeting.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Marika
> Konings
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:57 PM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Cc:* gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Final EPDP Report
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> As Rafik is traveling and in the interest of time, we are hereby sending
> you the EPDP Team’s Final Report. Per a request from last week’s Council
> meeting, we are attaching two versions of the report: (1) a clean version
> and (2) a red-lined version, which highlights the changes from the draft
> final report that was sent last week.
>
>
>
> As you review the Final Report, we would like to highlight the main
> updates made since the last version:
>
>
>
>    1. The chair has included the consensus designations in the body of
>    the Report. You may also review the table of consensus designations in
>    Annex E of the Final Report.
>    2. The following recommendations have been edited for clarification:
>       1. *Recommendation 6* - registrars may allow registered name
>       holders to consent to publish redacted data elements
>       2. *Recommendation 7 *– the first table has been deleted in order
>       to clarify which data elements are optional for registries to transfer to
>       registrars
>       3. *Recommendation 9 *– the language was been edited slightly to
>       note that Contractual Compliance may request registration data elements
>       under the Purpose 5 table, but the requests will be narrowly-tailored and
>       fit for purpose
>       4. *Recommendation 11* – the Team notes it is expecting additional
>       legal guidance with respect to the city field, and, accordingly, this
>       recommendation may be revisited in Phase 2 of the Team’s work
>       5. *Recommendation 12 *– the text has been altered to note that
>       publication of the Organization field is a requirement for registrars, not
>       registries. Additionally, registrars must phase into this treatment of the
>       Org field by no later than 29 February 2019.
>       6. *Recommendation 14 *– a note was added to that PPSAI is
>       currently in implementation and it will be important to understand the
>       interplay b/w this recommendation and the PPSAI IRT’s work. Further work
>       may be considered in Phase 2.
>       7. *Recommendation 15* – the data retention period has been changed
>       to 15 months
>       8. *Recommendation 17 *– text edited for clarity
>       9. *Recommendation 18* – the text has been clarified to note that
>       registrars and registries must reasonably consider and accommodate requests
>       for lawful disclosure and reasonable requests for disclosure must be
>       responded to within 30 days
>    3. Group statements, the Minority Statement and responses to Consensus
>    calls were submitted during the week prior to the close of deliberations.
>    Issues raised in those submissions regarding Final Report inconsistencies,
>    errors, and vagueness (as well as several substantive amendments) were
>    discussed following receipt of the reports and amendments were made where
>    the group agreed with those requested edits.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *Marika Konings*
>
> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>
> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>
>
>
> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>
> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=Cg5uQf0yAfw-qlFZ0WNBfsLmmtBNUiH0SuI6Vg-gXBQ&e=> and
> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=tT-E2RoAucUb3pfL9zmlbRdq1sytaEf765KOEkBVCjk&e=>. *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190221/886a5dc4/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list