[council] For your review - Final EPDP Report AND Council Motion

Thu Feb 21 10:58:11 UTC 2019

Hi,

I accept those friendly amendments.

Best,

Rafik

Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 11:35, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> If it is still possible to accept edits, I have a very small requested
> amendment to bullet six:
>
> *The EPDP Team was formed and held its first meeting on 1 August 2018,
> followed by the publication of the Charter-required “Triage” Report on 15
> September 2018, **and** its Initial Report on 21 November;*
>
> The edit is the addition of the word "and" as it improves readability of
> the sentence.
>
> I also suggest the insertion of a comma (',') between "members alternates"
> in the fourth resolve clause, i.e. *"The GNSO Council extends its sincere
> appreciation to the members**,** alternates and support staff of the EPDP
> Team for their tireless efforts to complete Phase 1 in the timeline
> available."*
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 10:39 PM, Rafik Dammak <
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> thanks for seconding the motion, I accept those edits as friendly
> amendments.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 06:29, Drazek, Keith via council <
> council at gnso.icann.org> a écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Following up Marika’s note forwarding the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report,
>> I have attached a slightly updated version of the draft motion for our
>> consideration during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting. I happily second this
>> motion put forward by Rafik, and I look forward to our discussion and
>> possible vote tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> As I have described previously, the motion includes approval of the EPDP
>> WG Phase One Final Report AND Council non-objection to the initiation of
>> Phase 2. Note that a deferral of tomorrow’s vote to 4 March, as requested
>> today by Marie, would delay initiation of Phase 2 by a commensurate period,
>> i.e. 10 days.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review the attached motion before tomorrow’s meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Marika
>> Konings
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:57 PM
>> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
>> *Cc:* gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Final EPDP
>> Report
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Councilors,
>>
>>
>>
>> As Rafik is traveling and in the interest of time, we are hereby sending
>> you the EPDP Team’s Final Report. Per a request from last week’s Council
>> meeting, we are attaching two versions of the report: (1) a clean version
>> and (2) a red-lined version, which highlights the changes from the draft
>> final report that was sent last week.
>>
>>
>>
>> As you review the Final Report, we would like to highlight the main
>> updates made since the last version:
>>
>>
>>
>>    1. The chair has included the consensus designations in the body of
>>    the Report. You may also review the table of consensus designations in
>>    Annex E of the Final Report.
>>    2. The following recommendations have been edited for clarification:
>>    1. *Recommendation 6* - registrars may allow registered name holders
>>       to consent to publish redacted data elements
>>       2. *Recommendation 7 *– the first table has been deleted in order
>>       to clarify which data elements are optional for registries to transfer to
>>       registrars
>>       3. *Recommendation 9 *– the language was been edited slightly to
>>       note that Contractual Compliance may request registration data elements
>>       under the Purpose 5 table, but the requests will be narrowly-tailored and
>>       fit for purpose
>>       4. *Recommendation 11* – the Team notes it is expecting additional
>>       legal guidance with respect to the city field, and, accordingly, this
>>       recommendation may be revisited in Phase 2 of the Team’s work
>>       5. *Recommendation 12 *– the text has been altered to note that
>>       publication of the Organization field is a requirement for registrars, not
>>       registries. Additionally, registrars must phase into this treatment of the
>>       Org field by no later than 29 February 2019.
>>       6. *Recommendation 14 *– a note was added to that PPSAI is
>>       currently in implementation and it will be important to understand the
>>       interplay b/w this recommendation and the PPSAI IRT’s work. Further work
>>       may be considered in Phase 2.
>>       7. *Recommendation 15* – the data retention period has been
>>       changed to 15 months
>>       8. *Recommendation 17 *– text edited for clarity
>>       9. *Recommendation 18* – the text has been clarified to note that
>>       registrars and registries must reasonably consider and accommodate requests
>>       for lawful disclosure and reasonable requests for disclosure must be
>>       responded to within 30 days
>>       3. Group statements, the Minority Statement and responses to
>>    Consensus calls were submitted during the week prior to the close of
>>    deliberations. Issues raised in those submissions regarding Final Report
>>    inconsistencies, errors, and vagueness (as well as several substantive
>>    amendments) were discussed following receipt of the reports and amendments
>>    were made where the group agreed with those requested edits.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>>
>>
>> *Marika Konings*
>>
>> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
>> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>>
>> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>>
>>
>>
>> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>>
>> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=Cg5uQf0yAfw-qlFZ0WNBfsLmmtBNUiH0SuI6Vg-gXBQ&e=> and
>> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=tT-E2RoAucUb3pfL9zmlbRdq1sytaEf765KOEkBVCjk&e=>. *
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> council mailing list
>> council at gnso.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190221/185dc97b/attachment.html>