[council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP

[Tatiana Tropina]

Hi Keith and all,
May I suggest a tiny factual correction. The letter says the F2F takes
place in Toronto on 14-16 January (?), but I think it’s 16-18 January.
Thanks!
Tanya

On Thu 10. Jan 2019 at 17:59, Drazek, Keith via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> Hi Darcy, all,
>
>
>
> Sure thing. Redline is attached.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> *From:* Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:45 AM
> *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> *Cc:* icann at ferdeline.com; council at gnso.icann.org
>
>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to
> ICANN Board on EPDP
>
>
>
> Keith, Can you share a redlined version?  I'm having trouble locating the
> prior draft that I thought was approved (and sent, honestly).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darcy
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:45 AM Drazek, Keith via council <
> council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply. I share your concerns and expect the Council will
> need to get involved later this month if/when it becomes apparent the EPDP
> WG will not meet the projected timeline. To that end, we all need to be
> working with our respective SGs and Cs to prepare for a “Plan B” discussion
> during our F2F in Los Angeles. In the interest of time, those conversations
> should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level
> discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act
> expeditiously and won’t be able to wait until the late-February Council
> meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:46 AM
> *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> *Cc:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to
> ICANN Board on EPDP
>
>
>
> While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this
> letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has
> made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer
> embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting
> its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible.
>
>
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
>
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council <
> council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14
> November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update
> on possible back-up plans.
>
>
>
> I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to
> avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed
> those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial
> Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are
> all in agreement this letter is ready to go.
>
>
>
> I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received
> before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to
> Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your attention!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20190110/2b6c6a5a/attachment.html>