[council] Fwd: [ECAdmin] Correspondence
lists at icann.guru
Wed Feb 5 18:38:09 UTC 2020
A complex topic from a procedural point of view, while I partially agree with the position ICANN Org has taken here I’m concerned about the precedent in which it sets in certain ways. A topic for the community to discuss going forward, but thankfully no immediate need for Council to take any actions here that I see.
I understand that at the SPS the topic of EC actions and the processes was discussed as a future action item for Council, having been around and involved during the drafting of the CCWG would be happy to work with Council leadership on this topic as I think as we see below that navigating these powers and our role as a Decisional Participant in the EC is something that I think we need to be more aware of and have a better grasp of the scope and requirements that it places on Council going forward.
From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "Drazek, Keith via council" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Reply to: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com>
Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2020 at 18:25
To: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
Subject: [council] Fwd: [ECAdmin] Correspondence
FYI, a response from ICANN to the ASO concerning their Empowered Community Decisional Participant inspection request. Copied to the EC Admin email list.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peg Rettino <peg.rettino at icann.org>
Date: February 5, 2020 at 1:05:52 PM EST
To: "ecadmin at icann.org" <ecadmin at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ECAdmin] Correspondence
The attached is sent on behalf of John Jeffrey.
Project Specialist & Executive Assistant to John Jeffrey
General Counsel and Secretary
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094
peg.rettino at icann.org<mailto:peg.rettino at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council