[council] [Ext] RE: FW: [ICANN Community Leaders] 2 March 2020

Caitlin Tubergen caitlin.tubergen at icann.org
Tue Mar 3 19:30:41 UTC 2020


Thank you for the good questions, Michele and Greg.

 

This survey is not intended to be quantitative; accordingly, there is no concern over “stuffing the box”. Respondents should choose the most applicable respondent category, but are welcome to fill out responses for more than one category.

 

I hope that is helpful. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

 

Best regards,

 

Caitlin

 

 

From: "DiBiase, Gregory" <dibiase at amazon.com>
Date: Monday, March 2, 2020 at 4:49 PM
To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com>, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>, "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [council] FW: [ICANN Community Leaders] 2 March 2020

 

Hi Caitlin,

 

Similar to Michele’s point, there does not seem to be guidance on whether the questionnaire should be completed multiple times if the respondent fits in several  categories (our friend Michele, for example, is a contracted party, a natural person registrant, a legal person registrant, and a data end-user).  Can you clarify?

 

Thanks,

Greg

 

From: council [mailto:council-bounces at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2020 4:04 PM
To: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>; council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][council] FW: [ICANN Community Leaders] 2 March 2020

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Caitlin

 

Thanks. 

I notice that the questionnaire does not capture who is completing it, so how does ICANN intend to avoid this being abused and the results thus manipulated? There’s no unique identifier collected from the respondent. 

 

Regards

 

Michele

 

--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com/ [blacknight.com]

https://blacknight.blog/ [blacknight.blog]

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ [michele.blog]

Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ [ceo.hosting]

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

 

 

From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
Date: Monday 2 March 2020 at 15:56
To: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] FW: [ICANN Community Leaders] 2 March 2020

 

Dear Councillors:

 

I would like to draw your attention to a reminder flagged in the Leadership Digest below.

 

Specifically, as part of ICANN org’s research for Recommendation 17.2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (EPDP) Phase 1 Final Report, the Global Domains Division (GDD) has prepared a short questionnaire to collect input on the risks, feasibility, and costs of differentiating between legal and natural persons in registration data directory services (RDDS).

For those interested, please share this questionnaire [icannprds.typeform.com] with your respective groups. The deadline to complete the questionnaire is Friday, 20 March 2020.

 

GDD staff plans to integrate the results of the questionnaire into the report on Recommendation 17.2 for the EPDP Team.

 

Thank you.

 

Kind regards,

 

Caitlin

--

Caitlin Tubergen

Policy Senior Manager - GNSO

ICANN

 

 

 

From: SO-AC-SG-CLeaders <so-ac-sg-cleaders-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Community Leadership Digest <david.olive at icann.org>
Reply-To: "policyinfo at icann.org" <policyinfo at icann.org>
Date: Monday, March 2, 2020 at 8:00 AM
To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org>
Subject: [ICANN Community Leaders] 2 March 2020

 

Monday, 2 March 2020
 

ICANN Community Leadership Digest
 

 

The ICANN org Policy Development Support function publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and follow updates.
 

Table of Contents
 

ICANN67 Virtual Community Forum
·     NEW: ICANN67 Schedule Now Available! ·     NEW: Areas of Interest for Joint Meetings with the ICANN Board ·     NEW: Language Services for ICANN67 ·     REMINDER: ICANN67 FAQ Information Sharing
·     NEW: ICANN Submits Comments on India's Draft Personal Data Protection Bill ·     NEW: CSC Findings on PTI Performance for February 2020 ·     REMINDER: EPDP Recommendation 17.2 Questionnaire ·     REMINDER: Nomination Period for ICANN Community Excellence Award 2020 Now Open Public Comment
·     CLOSES WEDNESDAY: Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report ·     Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2 ·     Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements ·     Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 ·     Middle East and Adjoining Countries (MEAC) Strategy 2021-2025 ·     Revised Community Travel Support Guidelines ·     NEW: Proposal for Chinese Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules 
 

 

 

ICANN67 Virtual Community Forum
 

NEW: ICANN67 Schedule Now Available! 
The schedule for the ICANN67 Virtual Community Forum [r20.rs6.net] is now available. A cross-functional team from ICANN collaborated with community groups to develop this schedule, which includes the sessions necessary to advance the community's policy and technical work.  
 
NEW: Areas of Interest for Joint Meetings with the ICANN Board 
Please refer to this workspace [r20.rs6.net] for a compilation of areas of interest submitted by ICANN community groups for discussion with the ICANN Board at the ICANN67 Virtual Community Forum. The workspace will be updated as more areas of interest are submitted. 
 
NEW: Language Services for ICANN67 
Learn more about the efforts ICANN org is making [r20.rs6.net] to mitigate the impact to real-time interpretation and translation for ICANN67 and to ensure the Virtual Community Forum is a valuable experience. 
 
REMINDER: ICANN67 FAQ 
Due to the global outbreak of COVID-19, the ICANN67 Community Forum scheduled for 7-12 March in Cancún, Mexico, will now be a virtual meeting with attendees participating remotely. We recognize the community has many questions about the new meeting schedule, travel arrangements, and other issues. Please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions [r20.rs6.net] webpage. 
 

Information Sharing
 

NEW: CSC Findings on PTI Performance for January 2020 
From: Lars-Johan Liman, CSC Chair 
 
INFORMATION SHARING
As chair of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC), I am pleased to provide you our latest monthly findings on the performance of Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) over January 2020. The CSC has concluded that PTI’s overall performance over January 2020 was “Satisfactory” - PTI met the service level agreement at 98.5% for the month of January 2020. The missed Service Level was satisfactorily explained and is subject to a CSC recommendation to introduce new measurements to create a more meaningful performance measurement for this process. The related PTI report to the CSC, listing the individual service level metrics along with their actual and historical performance, can be found he [r20.rs6.net]re [r20.rs6.net]. 
 
I am also very pleased to provide you an update on the one outstanding SLA amendment: the ccTLD Creation/Transfer – Validation and Reviews. In accordance with the SLA amendment process, the CSC has formally asked the ccNSO and GNSO Councils to agree to the amendment of the SLA. After both Councils support the change, implementation work will start. The SLA amendments are explained in more detail in the CSC Findings report. 
 
I am also pleased to inform you that the CSC and PTI have initiated a discussion on the possible scope of the role the CSC in the context of the IANA Naming Function Contract. This discussion will continue.
 
As you may be aware, the CSC was supposed to conduct an in person meeting during ICANN67 in Cancun and had scheduled meetings with the ICANN Board Technical Committee and IANA Function Review Team and would provide updates to the ccTLD managers present and Registry Stakeholder Group. However, with the change of ICANN67 to a virtual meeting, the CSC has cancelled its meeting during ICANN67. The next meeting will be at or around the regular meeting time.
 
BACKGROUND 
Generally, the CSC regular meeting is scheduled on or around the 15th every month, and the CSC findings report on the PTI performance is sent out shortly after that meeting. If you would like to be informed of upcoming meetings or receive CSC reports directly, you may want to subscribe to our announce lis [r20.rs6.net]t [r20.rs6.net]. Any comments on our reporting to you is welcome.  
 
The CSC became effective 1 October 2016. Background information on the committee along with transcripts of our meetings and other useful information can be found here [r20.rs6.net]. 
 

 

REMINDER: EPDP Recommendation 17.2 Questionnaire 
From: Cyrus Namazi, Senior Vice President, Global Domains Division 
 
INFORMATION SHARING
As part of ICANN org’s research for Recommendation 17.2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (EPDP) Phase 1 Final Report, the Global Domains Division (GDD) has prepared a short questionnaire to collect input on the risks, feasibility, and costs of differentiating between legal and natural persons in registration data directory services (RDDS).
 
Members of ICANN community groups with a view on the subject are invited to fill out and share the questionnaire [r20.rs6.net] before Friday, 20 March 2020. 
 
Results will be integrated into the report on Recommendation 17.2 for the EPDP Team.
 

 

REMINDER: Nomination Period for ICANN Community Excellence Award 2020 Now Open 
From: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support 
 
INFORMATION SHARING
The nomination period for the ICANN Community Excellence Award 2020 is now open. Formerly known as the Multistakeholder Ethos Award, the ICANN Community Excellence Award recognizes ICANN community members who substantively contribute to policymaking within the ICANN ecosystem and who are deeply invested in developing consensus-based solutions within ICANN’s multistakeholder model. Learn more about the nomination process [r20.rs6.net] and submit your nominations here [r20.rs6.net]. 
 

Public Comment
 

CLOSES WEDNESDAY: Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report [r20.rs6.net] 
Close Date: Wednesday, 4 March 2020 
 
Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2 [r20.rs6.net]
Close Date: Monday, 23 March 2020 
 
Draft Proposal for NextGen at ICANN Program Improvements [r20.rs6.net]
Close Date: Tuesday, 31 March 2020 
 
Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 [r20.rs6.net]
Close Date: Tuesday, 31 March 2020 
 
Middle East and Adjoining Countries (MEAC) Strategy 2021-2025 [r20.rs6.net]
Close Date: Friday, 3 April 2020 
 
Revised Community Travel Support Guidelines [r20.rs6.net]
Close Date: Monday, 13 April 2020 
 
NEW: Proposal for Chinese Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules [r20.rs6.net] 
Close Date: Thursday, 20 April 2020 
 

Volume 2, Issue 18 | Archive [r20.rs6.net] | Next Issue: Thursday, 5 March 2020 
 

ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 
Unsubscribe so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org [visitor.constantcontact.com] 
Update Profile [visitor.constantcontact.com] | About Constant Contact [constantcontact.com] 
Sent by david.olive at icann.org in collaboration with 
[constantcontact.com] 
Try email marketing for free today! [constantcontact.com] 
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20200303/116efd60/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4620 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20200303/116efd60/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the council mailing list