[council] Motion: Initiation of a Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy

Jeff Neuman jeff at jjnsolutions.com
Mon Feb 8 15:04:31 UTC 2021


Carlton,

While not a consensus policy, ICANN has created a “De-Accreditation Process” which can be found at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/dartp-11jul13-en.pdf.

Unfortunately, when dealing with Court Orders, especially ones that do have jurisdiction over the registrar, national sovereignty issues become much more complicated and I am not sure there is any Consensus Policy that could even address such a situation where as in Net4India, a Court orders that ICANN does not terminate the RAA until the bankruptcy proceedings are final.

Here is the latest from ICANN on the Net4India situation:  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2021-01-29-en

Sincerely,

Jeff

[cid:image001.png at 01D6FE01.CB0F2C80]
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Founder & CEO
JJN Solutions, LLC
p: +1.202.549.5079
E: jeff at jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com>
http://jjnsolutions.com


From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Carlton Samuels
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2021 11:15 AM
To: Pam Little <pam.little at alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org; council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] Motion: Initiation of a Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy

Dear Pam:
I would wish to second this motion.

This aside, to councilors and staff more familiar with these matters, I would like to know whether any consensus policy covers situations such as has emerged from the Net4India situation? I'm presuming that a compliance issue - perhaps a transfer request, singly or in bulk, from [a] registrant[s] in the middle of a bankruptcy declaration process - could have occurred before now. What is the compliance standby when asset conservation under court order could have frustrated compliance by the registrar?

Best,
Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================


On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 6:47 PM Pam Little <pam.little at alibaba-inc.com<mailto:pam.little at alibaba-inc.com>> wrote:
Dear Councilors,

Please find attached a motion on Initiation of a Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy to be considered at the GNSO Council meeting on 18 February 2021 at 19:00 UTC.

Respectfully submitted,



Pam Little

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210208/35b09ef3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20591 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210208/35b09ef3/image001-0001.png>


More information about the council mailing list