[council] SubPro Resolution Second and Amendment

[Kurt Pritz]

Dear Flip and fellow Councillors: 

Thanks very much for the work done on the motion (recognizing that is a small percentage of the multi-year effort that has been put in).

I’d be pleased to second the motion. I also wish to offer two amendments supported by the RrSG and RySG Leadership that should, I think, be considered separately. 

The first amendment removes the second portion of this part of the resolution:  

The GNSO Council adopts the Final Report of the SubPro Working Group and recommends the implementation of each of the Outputs that have obtained either Consensus or Full Consensus designations by the ICANN Board of Directors.

The GNSO Council requests that the ICANN Board take note of Recommendations 35.2 and 35.4, the two Outputs that have obtained Strong Support but Significant Opposition, including the rationale and the minority statements associated with those Outputs.

The reasons for this were described in an earlier email. Briefly, we think the Board will have an easier time approving the SubPro recommendations if they are not put in the position of considering policy that is not supported by a consensus of the working group. In addition, we think it is important to draw a bright line that is congruent with the working group's agreement that only consensus-level recommendations would become part of the next program round. 

The second amendment adapts the first portion of the same amendment to more assertively fulfill the Council’s policy role: 

The GNSO Council adopts the Final Report of the SubPro Working Group and recommends the implementation of each of the Outputs that have obtained either Consensus or Full Consensus designations by the ICANN Board of Directors.

Becomes, 

The GNSO Council approves, and recommends that the ICANN Board adopt, all the Outputs Affirmations, Recommendations and Implementation Guidance that were determined to have received either Full Consensus or Consensus designations as documented in the SubPro PDP Working Group's Final Report.

The reason for this is that the Council is in the business of making (through its delegated Working Groups) and approving specific policy and associated recommendations — and not reports generally. Again, we think that refining this portion of the resolution will facilitate acceptance by the Board and better focus the role fo the Council. 

I and other RrSG and RySG Council representatives can answer questions or requests for additional information. An edited version of the amendment is attached. 

 Best regards,

Kurt


. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210217/4053cf84/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 21 02 12 SubPro Final Report Motion Friendly amendment-proposed(17Feb).docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 40299 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210217/4053cf84/210212SubProFinalReportMotionFriendlyamendment-proposed17Feb-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210217/4053cf84/attachment-0003.html>