[council] [CORRESPONDENCE] Maarten Botterman to Philippe Fouquart - EPDP on the Temp Spec for gTLD Registration Data Phase 2

Mon Feb 22 16:51:06 UTC 2021

Thank you Kurt for fully laying out the arguments and doing a better job of
synthesizing Council's and Board's writings as well as undergird with the
details how my concerns inre risk pricing could inform a more fulsome
cost/benefit analysis and thusly, a fit-for-purpose ODP.

I can support all the points you made.

Carlton

==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 4:46 PM Kurt Pritz via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> Hi Philippe and everyone:
>
> In response to your requests for thoughts on the Board consultation and
> the letter received from the Board this past Friday, I have drafted some
> ideas for a statement in response.
>
> I welcome edits and questions.
>
> Given the timing, I am just sharing these same thoughts with the CPH EPDP
> members now also.
>
> Depending on the level of support this receives. It could be read on
> behalf of the Council and if not, the CPH or CPH EPDP team, and if not,
> just me.
>
> I hope it is clear and helpful
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 1:22 PM, Tom Dale <tomwdale at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you Kurt.
>
> That was also my initial response to the correspondence. There appears to
> be a none-too-subtle gap between the Council’s request and the Board’s
> response.
>
> Re the ODP, has the concept/framework/guidelines/whatever been published
> in final form since the January webinar? I can’t seem to find it. The
> relevant web page
> <https://community.icann.org/display/ODP/Operational+Design+Phase+Home> suggests
> they are still processing community input.
>
> I will look at in more detail over the weekend.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Kurt Pritz
> via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Date: *Saturday, 20 February 2021 at 7:46 am
> *To: *philippe.fouquart at orange.com <philippe.fouquart at orange.com>
> *Cc: *council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] [CORRESPONDENCE] Maarten Botterman to Philippe
> Fouquart - EPDP on the Temp Spec for gTLD Registration Data Phase 2
> Hi Philippe and everyone:
>
> I have given some thought to this but not enough and hope to have
> something well (or at least better) thought out by Monday.
>
> My early thinking is that:
>
>
> 1. The Council resolution called for a specific analysis: "Noting some of
> the questions surrounding the financial sustainability of SSAD and some of
> the concerns expressed within the different minority statements, the GNSO
> Council requests a consultation with the ICANN Board as part of the
> delivery of the GNSO Council Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board to
> discuss these issues, including whether a further cost-benefit analysis
> should be conducted before the ICANN Board considers all SSAD-related
> recommendations for adoption."
>
> The resolution doesn't request an "ODP"; it requests analysis of
> sustainability and cost-benefit.
>
> 2. The Board responded and stated, essentially, “we welcome the
> consultation and will create a methodology (the ODP) to address the issues
> raised.”
>
> 3, The Council wrote: great, here are the items we think are necessary to
> accomplish the analysis of sustainability and cost-benefit (and listed the
> items in Philipp’s email below).
>
> 4. Now Maarten has responded, "well, an ODP doesn’t cover those things."
>
>
> In other words, the Council did not ask for an “ODP,” it requested
> analysis of financial sustainability and cost-benefit. The Board invented
> an ODP and then said, it does not apply to the request of the Council.
>
> In addition, the comment of the Council on the ODP draft was that there be
> transparency throughout the ODP process. In this most recent letter, the
> Board essentially states, we will have this consultation now and another
> when the ODP is complete. With that statement, I think we should pointedly
> discuss transparency, especially as one of the approaches that might lend
> itself well to SSAD is a phased or agile-like implementation.
>
> Again I apologize for the not-well-thought out blurt. I will attempt to
> draft a statement on behalf of the CPH for the meeting and can consult with
> any of you over the weekend on it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 10:12 AM, philippe.fouquart--- via council <
> council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:
>
> Dear Councillors,
>
> In preparation for our call with the board on Monday, please have a
> thought  the specific aspects you would like to raise in relation to the
> launch of the ODP for the SSAD, and share them with the list if you can.
>
> For example, as it relates to the Maarten’s letter below, there seems to
> be a difference of appreciation on the aspects which the operational
> assessment is expected to cover, as identified in Council’s previous letter
>
> https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/gnso-council-to-icann-board-22jan21-en.pdf
> .
> The Council suggests that the operational impact assessment would cover,
> at a minimum, the following aspects:
> ·         Expected costs / resources;
> ·         Expected benefits;
> ·         Expected time-to-market;
> ·         Possible business risks;
> ·         Possible legal risks;
> ·         Possible reputational risks;
> ·         Implementation considerations (e.g., outsourcing or phased
> deployment of the solution);
> ·         Opportunity Costs (e.g., what projects, if any, would be put on
> hold or not move forward to implement the SSAD).
>
> Thanks.
> Regards,
> Philippe
>
> *From:* FOUQUART Philippe TGI/OLN
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2021 4:29 PM
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* FW: [CORRESPONDENCE] Maarten Botterman to Philippe Fouquart -
> EPDP on the Temp Spec for gTLD Registration Data Phase 2
>
> Dear Councillors,
>
> Please note the attached response on our EPDP phase 2 letter to the board
> in advance of our call next week.
>
> This is mostly relative to how we approach the discussion, but I’ll quote
> the part that deals with the remit of this ODP.
>
> The Board also would like to remind the Council that the purpose of the
> ODP is to assess the operational impact of the SSAD-related policy
> recommendations on ICANN org and to inform the Board of these impacts prior
> to the Board's consideration of the policy recommendations. The ODP is not
> intended to determine whether the concept of the SSAD accounts for the cost
> and effort required to implement the proposed system. We believe this
> specific question has been addressed by the Council in approving the
> recommendations and forwarding them to the Board.
>
> Best regards,
> Philippe
>
> *From:* Gnso-chairs [mailto:gnso-chairs-bounces at icann.org
> <gnso-chairs-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Wendy Profit via
> Gnso-chairs
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2021 2:50 AM
> *To:* gnso-chairs at icann.org; gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Cc:* Maarten Botterman <maarten.botterman at board.icann.org>; Secretary <
> secretary at icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence at icann.org>; Board
> Ops Team <board-ops-team at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [gnso-chairs] [CORRESPONDENCE] Maarten Botterman to Philippe
> Fouquart - EPDP on the Temp Spec for gTLD Registration Data Phase 2
>
> Dear Philippe Fouquart,
>
> Please find the attached letter from Maarten Botterman regarding the EPDP
> on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Phase 2.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
>
> Wendy Profit
> ICANN
> Board Operations Senior Manager
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
> Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
>
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210222/023a9e98/attachment-0001.html>