[council] FW: Agenda for GNSO-GAC Bilateral on 25 October 2021: Preliminary Points from the GAC

[philippe.fouquart at orange.com]

Dear Councilors,

For your review for our meeting with the GAC and before that as noted yesterday, for our "GNSO Council Priorities and Prep Session" where we will prepare that GNSO Council - GAC meeting.

Regards,
Philippe



Orange Restricted
From: Gnso-chairs <gnso-chairs-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Manal Ismail via Gnso-chairs
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 3:13 AM
To: jeff at jjnsolutions.com; gnso-chairs at icann.org
Cc: gac-leadership at icann.org; 'Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch' <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>
Subject: [gnso-chairs] Agenda for GNSO-GAC Bilateral on 25 October 2021: Preliminary Points from the GAC

Dear GNSO Council Leadership and Jeff,

Please find below the GAC talking points and questions prepared for the GNSO-GAC Bilateral next week as part of ICANN72. We hope this is helpful to prepare for our dialogue.

Thank you,

Kind regards,
--Manal
------------------------------
25 Oct. 2021  |  ICANN72 Bilateral Questions

Agenda (Confirmed)

  *   EPDP Phase 2 A - Status and Scope of GNSO Vote on Recommendations;
  *   Accuracy - Scoping team to kick-off after EPDP 2A is finished;
  *   DNS Abuse -  and the still open question whether policy work is envisaged by GNSO;
  *   EPDP-IGO Curative protections

EPDP Phase 2A:
Regarding EPDP Phase 2A, the GAC wishes to note that eight (8) minority statements were filed to the EPDP Phase 2A final report, representing arguably the views of a majority of ICANN constituents. Bearing this in mind, to what extent does the GNSO Council consider that the Final Report reflects consensus from the community and is in the public interest?
The GAC considers that this possibly merits a deeper reflection on the current Policy Development Process with a view to ensuring that it is better able to reflect the views and input of all ICANN constituents - what are the GNSO Council's views on such a reflection exercise?

Accuracy:

  *   Continues to be a GAC priority topic
  *   To be handled by the upcoming GNSO Accuracy Scoping Team
  *   GAC confirmed its representation (EC and US)
  *   GNSO Council appointed a Chair for the Scoping Team (Michael Palage)
  *   Timeline is not yet clear
  *   Any further updates at this stage

DNS Abuse:

  *   A long-standing topic of interest to the GAC
  *   GAC is closely following any relevant developments
  *   Pending question on how to handle (PDP, CCWG, ...)
  *   GAC's interest in advancing community discussions, driving progress and converging views prior the launch of new gTLDs
  *   GNSO thoughts on potential next steps

EPDP IGO Curative Protections:

  *   The GAC has provided input and Advice on this topic, notably with respect to the creation of a curative mechanism which respects IGO status under international law (in particular with respect to privileges and immunities), and looks forward to a positive resolution of the current EPDP.
  *   At the same time, as the public comment period on the EPDP Initial Report will have closed yesterday (24-Oct), it may be appropriate to revisit this topic at a later occasion.
---------------------------------

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20211019/8169d9f7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20211019/8169d9f7/ATT00001-0001.txt>