[council] Review of the GNSO job description for NomCom

Wed Sep 22 03:35:07 UTC 2021

I wondered about this but focused on the meaning of 'unaffiliated' in
context. I took the meaning to be applied as '*being independent and not
taking the 'whip' from any other person or group*'.

I chose to reject an Orwellian interpretation. But at the risk of being
accused of special pleading, I cannot see how one can avoid some history in
one or other ICANN group/constituency/gathering/special interest and come
to Council ready to fully participate. I submit that a neophyte to the
ICANN environment would be totally disadvantaged.

I do not have a pecuniary interest in names and numbers policy development;
no money invested in registry or registrars. Neither do I work for a
registry or registrar. But I do have permanent interests. I came to the
names and numbers policy development in supporting the public interest;
that of the people in my home region on any matter that impinges on the
access to and provident use of the Internet for their social and economic
development. My antecedents and experience in the At-Large constituency
socialized me to the ICANN ways. If you look at the issues surrounding my
interests - ICANN in the global IG framework, equitable access to
registration data services, privacy, applicant support for expanding
opportunities for businesses in the Global South participating in the
domain name business - you will find my investments in knowledge and time.
Yes, matters pertaining to those issues could and have come before Council;
defining charters for WGs; adopting policy recommendations for WGs, even
deciding if an issue is worthy of examination.

I argue my convictions but will always leave room for constructive
alliances to objective. This is the imperative that I should think is the
essence of the vaunted multistakeholder framework we say we are severally
committed to. I do not take the whip ever. But in an organization whose
entire being is based on interests represented - and I'm speaking of the
Council - one would be dumber than...well, let's say it would be
counterintuitive not to seek allies for advancing those interests
consistent with one's objective.

Carlton

==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:07 AM Flip Petillion via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> All:
>
>
>
> I am puzzled about the proposed addition ‘preferences will be given to
> candidates who are not affiliated with a SO/AC or GNSO Stakeholder Group or
> Constituency’, especially as you propose to delete that an applicant must
> act in the larger public interest, which is a key goal of ICANN.
> Can Council Leadership articulate with greater precision and detail the
> precise nature of their concerns?  Also, it seems a rarity to find someone
> with the appropriate depth of experience within ICANN needed to be
> effective at Council who is also unaffiliated with any of ICANN’s various
> groups.  Is there a list of such unaffiliated persons from which to draw
> future nominations?  The IPC is not aware of any such list.
>
> Isn’t there a risk that appointed candidates with no apparent connection,
> refrain from playing an active role ? Are we not better served if members
> show up and actively engage ?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Best
>
>
>
> Flip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Flip Petillion
>
> fpetillion at petillion.law
>
> +32484652653
>
> www.petillion.law
>
>
>
> [image: id:image001.png at 01D3691D.DA7539C0] <https://www.petillion.law/>
>
>
>
>   Attorneys – Advocaten – Avocats
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Olga
> Cavalli via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Reply to: *Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 17 September 2021 at 22:29
> *To: *Marie Pattullo - AIM <marie.pattullo at aim.be>
> *Cc: *"gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>, "council at gnso.icann.org"
> <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] Review of the GNSO job description for NomCom
>
>
>
> Hi Philippe,
>
>
>
> I agree with the changes included in the document you shared and  also
> agree with those changes suggested by Marie.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Olga
>
>
>
> El vie, 17 sept 2021 a las 12:54, Marie Pattullo - AIM via council (<
> council at gnso.icann.org>) escribió:
>
> Thanks, Philippe.
>
>
>
> Some very minor suggestions from the BC:
>
>
>
> *Responsibilities*
>
> ●        Attend monthly GNSO Council meetings held remotely.
>
> *Qualifications*
>
> ●        Willingness, ability, and commitment to travel to and actively
> participate in ICANN's three Public Meetings per year, or participate
> virtually, if applicable, as well as attend all monthly remote Council
> meetings, and serve as a volunteer on the Council throughout the term.
>
>
>
> (specifying these are calls and do not require travel)
>
>
>
> Wishing you all a wonderful weekend!
>
>
>
> Marie
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> *On Behalf Of *philippe.fouquart---
> via council
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 September 2021 19:13
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org
> *Cc:* gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* [council] Review of the GNSO job description for NomCom
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Some of you may be aware that in recent years, the GNSO Council is invited
> on an annual basis to review the job description that the ICANN Nominating
> Committee uses in order to fulfil its appointments to the GNSO Council. The
> job description is a critical piece of guidance for the NomCom to ensure
> that it appoints GNSO Councilors that will succeed in their role. In an
> effort to try and make the job descriptions consistent across the various
> community organization, ICANN org made non-substantive updates to the job
> description structure. Council leadership has used this as the starting
> point for this review cycle. There is a window of opportunity for such a
> review, so we would like to use it lest this be deferred to a much later
> stage.
>
>
>
> The GNSO Council has made incremental improvements to the criteria each
> year, and it is with the goal to continually refine the guidance to the
> NomCom that Council leadership has made suggested redlines in the attached.
>
>
>
> You will see that the redlines focus primarily on the affiliation of
> candidates, where leadership believes that preference should be given
> towards non-affiliated candidates. This is of particular importance when
> the appointee will serve as a voting Councilor, where the balance of the
> Council needs to be considered; voting NomCom appointees may be in position
> to provide deciding votes, so it is important that they act independently.
> I want to stress that the suggested redlines are absolutely not in reaction
> to any particular appointees, recent or not, but rather a conclusion
> reached over the course of several cycles.
>
>
>
> Please review the attached document and provide feedback by the end of
> this week.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
>
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210921/0d90d565/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7395 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20210921/0d90d565/image001-0001.png>