[council] FW: Final Question Set 4 and Update

Tue Aug 2 08:05:34 UTC 2022

Dear Councilors,

Please see Jeff's email below with the responses to Question Set 4 and other items, and in particular the question of a SubPro session at the next ICANN meeting, either in plenary or with the ODP team and individual constituencies.

As Jeff notes the setup of the new council at the AGM and approaching completion of the ODP would also be a good opportunity to think about the timing and planning of the IRT(s). Please have a look at the suggested topics.

Thank you.
Philippe

Orange Restricted
From: Jeff Neuman <jeff at jjnsolutions.com>
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 6:02 PM
To: FOUQUART Philippe INNOV/NET <philippe.fouquart at orange.com>; Sebastien at registry.godaddy; Tomslin Samme-Nlar (mesumbeslin at gmail.com) <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>; Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
Subject: Final Question Set 4 and Update

Dear Council Leadership,

Please let the Council know that the responses to Question Set 4 have been submitted.  A big thank you to the small team of Councilors that helped me with the responses including Paul, Justine, Desiree, Flip and of course ICANN support.

First, just a reminder that the responses to Question Set 5 are due on Wednesday next week.  Justine and Paul have weighed in on it, so thanks to them again!

Second, I had a call this week with the ICANN SubPro Team (minus Karen who was on a well deserved vacation).  In addition to discussing the Question Sets, I wanted to relay the following:

  1.  The ODP Team informed me that the SO/AC leaders did not seem to have any interest in a SubPro session at ICANN 75 in KL.  I wanted to verify that this was the case since I had not heard anything from the SO/AC leaders on this.  I also wanted to say that this could be an important missed opportunity for us to start some of the needed discussions including on the complete set of ODP Assumptions (See next item).  There is a lot of work ahead of us, so I just wanted to verify that the community did or did not want a SubPro session.

  1.  At some point in August, ICANN will publish its final set of assumptions that will be included in the Operational Design Analysis (ODA).  This sets the basis for setting the budget and dictating the resources that will be needed to implement and Launch the next round(s).  As this would be timely, I do believe it may be worth discussing with the Community at ICANN 75 if that is something the community were interested in.

  1.  Whether or not there is a session at ICANN 75, the ODP Team has reminded me to let you all know that they are available to meet with any constituency, SG or AC at ICANN 75 to discuss the status of the project.

  1.  At this point Question Set 5 is the last set of questions that the ODP team has.  This does not mean that there will not be other questions later, but they believe they have a handle on all of the Outputs of the GNSO Final Report, the Recommendations and Implementation Guidance.

  1.  However, there is still a lot of work ahead of us as the GNSO Community.  We need to start planning for the Implementation Review Team and additional work.  To do this, I would propose:

     *   Having this is a discussion item at the GNSO Council SPS since there will be some new Councilors and it will likely have an impact on the work that the Council is going to be responsible for starting next Calendar Year.  The F2F session in LA in December is a great time to discuss the impacts of this on the Council work load.
     *   If the ODA is delivered in December, the Board could likely vote on it in February or March, which means that the ICANN staff could kick off an IRT shortly thereafter.  The Council should determine whether this IRT will be like normal IRTs that are completely open or whether it will be a limited representative group.  If the later, then I would propose starting off the discussion on the composition of this group in January so that when it is approved, we do not lose a month or two discussing this and getting the logistics set up.
     *   Although we are likely kicking off the GGP on Applicant Support in August (hopefully), there are going to be other discreet topics that will need to be addressed and they may be a lot for a single IRT.  This includes:

                                                               i.      Finalizing the structure and rules for the SPIRT

                                                             ii.      Implementing the Pre-Evaluation Program for Back-End Registry Service Providers

                                                           iii.      Finalizing and implementing the Outreach and Communication Strategy

                                                           iv.      Drafting the Applicant Guidebook

                                                             v.      Finalize the Process/Procedures for Private/Specialized Domain Names (SSAC 113)

                                                           vi.      Confirm Maximum Delegation Rate of TLDs (Affirmation/Recommendations in Section 26 of Final Report)

                                                          vii.      Challenge / Appeals Mechanisms for Evaluations / Objections (Section 32 of the Final Report)

     *   There are a lot of external Dependencies that can also impact the next round, including:

                                                               i.      IDN ePDP Work

                                                             ii.      Implementation of the Revisions to the RPMs

                                                           iii.      Name Collision work by the NCAP / SSAC

  1.  All of this is a reminder to state that once the ODA is done and the Board votes on approving the policies, even assuming they approve it in March 2023, there is still a ton of things for the community to do before an application window can open.  I personally believe planning should begin ASAP, but it is up to the Council and the Community to determine what happened and when.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Jeff

[cid:image001.png at 01D8A341.251A1E20]

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Founder & CEO
JJN Solutions, LLC
p: +1.202.549.5079
E: jeff at jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com>
http://jjnsolutions.com

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20220802/ce54f105/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 67520 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20220802/ce54f105/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SubPro ODP_Question Set 4.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 285149 bytes
Desc: SubPro ODP_Question Set 4.pdf
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20220802/ce54f105/SubProODP_QuestionSet4-0001.pdf>