[council] [gnso-chairs] PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board sessions

Tomslin Samme-Nlar mesumbeslin at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 19:41:31 UTC 2023


I am happy to join the team too.

Warmly,
Tomslin
@LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomslin/


On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 at 23:14, Paul McGrady via council <
council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:

> *Disclaimers:*
>
> *Subject to a final greenlight from Council Leadership to proceed.*
>
> *Written early in the morning on a Saturday – forgive typos*.
>
>
>
> Thanks Mark!
>
>
>
> All, it would be great to have 1 or 2 more so that we are sure to get a
> full range of eyes on this, especially helpful if they were Non-commercial
> and Contracted Parties voices to round us out.  Special request that Jeff
> join the team as this is a question from the GAC.  Also, if you don’t have
> time to participate on the bespoke small team but have thoughts on Tripti’s
> question, please do put your comments into the document (diamonds in the
> rough welcome – the team can polish later).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark W. Datysgeld <mark at governanceprimer.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2023 11:22 PM
> *To:* Paul McGrady <paul at elstermcgrady.com>; Steve Chan <
> steve.chan at icann.org>; Sebastien at registry.godaddy; COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG;
> GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>; gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [council] [gnso-chairs] PLEASE READ - ICANN76
> Stakeholders/Board sessions
>
>
>
> Since I have been been banging the drum about Council-Board interaction, I
> think I should step up for this team.
>
>
>
> Lead us to greatness, Paul.
>
> ---
>
> Mark W. Datysgeld
> Director at Governance Primer
> ICANN GNSO Councilor
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Paul McGrady via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2023 18:37
> *To:* Steve Chan; Sebastien at registry.godaddy; COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG;
> GNSO-Chairs; gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [council] [gnso-chairs] PLEASE READ - ICANN76
> Stakeholders/Board sessions
>
>
>
> Thanks Steve!  The document looks great.  I’ll await the final greenlight
> from Seb that the bespoke small team is the final plan and then the
> resulting flood of volunteers.  Once we are at that point, I hope Staff
> will send around a Doodle to help us get our kickoff meeting scheduled.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2023 1:14 PM
> *To:* Sebastien at registry.godaddy; Paul McGrady <paul at elstermcgrady.com>;
> COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG; GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>;
> gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-chairs] PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board
> sessions
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Please find a Google doc created for this exercise. Permissions are
> currently set to allow for comments, but once we know who will be taking
> part in the effort besides Paul, we will provide Editor rights:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1igtbNSUBMc3cIFlR7-zTyg5epNwfm7ImkxaP_K-8Uw8/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> Note that in the Google document, we have also included the potential
> questions to the ICANN Board as by shared by Sebastien. We are assuming
> that similar planning will be needed once the topics are agreed to by the
> Council.
>
>
>
> It sounds like the Councilors will organize themselves, but if you need
> any assistance from support staff, just let us know.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Gnso-chairs <gnso-chairs-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Sebastien--- via Gnso-chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>
> *Reply-To: *"Sebastien at registry.godaddy" <Sebastien at registry.godaddy>
> *Date: *Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM
> *To: *Paul McGrady <paul at elstermcgrady.com>, "COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG" <
> council at gnso.icann.org>, GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>, "
> gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [gnso-chairs] PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board
> sessions
>
>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>
>
> Thank you for raising your hand for this, it is much appreciated.
>
>
>
> I think that in the past we would have taken this to the mailing list, but
> I must admit it is not my favorite medium: I tend to get quickly lost in
> the sub-threads (I am probably showing my age).
>
>
>
> The current thinking should lead us to a small team setup, but given the
> short timelines I wouldn’t want to waste any of it haggling over how to
> form it.
>
>
>
> Could I suggest that:
>
>    1. We initiate immediately a bespoke small team headed by Paul McGrady
>    + eventually a single co-lead from the other house should anyone volunteer.
>    2. Membership to open to all Councillors. Should any Councillor need
>    external input, he/she can seek it but remains the small team sole member.
>    3. Staff to create a bespoke Google Doc with the Board’s questions.
>    4. The small team takes it from there with the aim of gathering our
>    thoughts by March 3rd.
>
>
>
> Council colleagues: Thoughts? Comments?
>
>
>
> Kindly,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sebastien Ducos*
>
> GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
>
> [image: signature_1287335570]
>
> +33612284445
>
> France & Australia
>
> sebastien at registry.godaddy
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paul McGrady <paul at elstermcgrady.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 4:32 pm
> *To: *Sebastien Ducos <Sebastien at registry.godaddy>, COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG
> <council at gnso.icann.org>, GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>,
> gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject: *RE: PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board sessions
>
> You don't often get email from paul at elstermcgrady.com. Learn why this is
> important [aka.ms]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification__;!!PtGJab4!5Op6xSBTHrIfGbtr3DjEq3l-bKmjB_LFUrniT_xfC6TL1CbdAgBX6o9JvVjLAh8B6jMHywSFJLUVnQlEU1i9xUSkzddn$>
>
> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad at .
>
>
>
> Thanks Seb!  I think our questions to the Board proposed below look great
> and touch on important concerns.
>
>
>
> As for Tripti’s question, what will be our mechanism to respond?  Should
> we (1) start a shared document that folks can contribute to, (2) do we want
> to run a short-lived small team to develop a draft for the broader Council
> to review (I’m happy to lead that effort if you like), (3) do we send ideas
> to the mailing list and have staff compile them and then we all edit the
> compilation, (4) something else?
>
>
>
> Also, we need to have milestone deadlines so that we aren’t scrambling and
> doing this on airplanes to Cancun.  Thanks!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Sebastien---
> via council
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2023 9:01 AM
> *To:* COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG; GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>;
> gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [council] PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board sessions
>
>
>
> Dear Council Colleagues,
>
>
>
> A short note to correct my previous email:
>
> While the Board would like us to prepare our response to their question
> ahead of our meeting, the March 1st deadline if for us to submit our
> questions to them.
>
>
>
> Here are some questions already floated:
>
>    - *Ensuring Board and ICANN org input to PDP processes*
>    How do we minimize the need for an ODP and minimize its impact when it
>    is needed?
>    What further information or details should the GNSO integrate into a
>    PDP Final Report to ensure it delivers Board-ready recommendations?
>    - *Getting to the next round of new gTLDs*
>    What in the Boards view would be required of the GNSO Council and
>    Community to secure a Next Round Launch Date by the 2023 AGM?
>    - *WHOIS Disclosure System*
>    The Council’s recommendations were delivered 3 months ago which
>    corresponds to ICANN Org’s ramp up requirement; has the development been
>    initiated? What assistance can the Council and its small team offer to
>    ensure initial timelines are met?
>
>
>
> Kindly,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sebastien Ducos*
>
> GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
>
> [image: signature_3093328915]
>
> +33612284445
>
> France & Australia
>
> sebastien at registry.godaddy
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of
> Sebastien--- via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 2:00 pm
> *To: *COUNCIL at GNSO.ICANN.ORG <council at gnso.icann.org>, GNSO-Chairs <
> gnso-chairs at icann.org>, gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[council] FW: PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board sessions
>
> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad at .
>
>
>
> Dear Council Colleagues,
>
>
>
> Please find below a letter from Tripti Sinha on behalf of the Board
> regarding our session in Cancun.
>
>
>
> In particular the Board would like for us to respond to the following by
> March 1st:
>
>
>
> *The final SupPro report assigns resolution of many, potentially complex
> issues to the Implementation Review Team (IRT).  IRTs can - and sometimes
> have - become bottlenecks, for example, in connection with efforts to
> relitigate policy outcomes or where there are gaps in the policy being
> implemented.  What concrete steps can the board, org, or community (or all
> 3 collectively) take to improve the IRT process?  Please be as concrete as
> possible.*
>
>
>
> Please note that as per our discussion with Becky today, I also expect we
> will receive a list of clarifying questions on the SubPro Recommendations
> themselves.
>
>
>
> Kindly,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sebastien Ducos*
>
> GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
>
> [image: signature_1469584128]
>
> +33612284445
>
> France & Australia
>
> sebastien at registry.godaddy
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Gnso-chairs <gnso-chairs-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Vinciane
> Koenigsfeld via Gnso-chairs <gnso-chairs at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 7:23 pm
> *To: *gnso-chairs at icann.org <gnso-chairs at icann.org>
> *Cc: *becky.burr at board.icann.org <becky.burr at board.icann.org>,
> matthew.shears at board.icann.org <matthew.shears at board.icann.org>
> *Subject: *[gnso-chairs] PLEASE READ - ICANN76 Stakeholders/Board sessions
>
> Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad at .
>
>
>
> *Sent on behalf of Tripti Sinha, Chair, ICANN Board of Directors*
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Generic Names Supporting Organization Council Leaders,
>
>
>
> **Please reply no later than Wednesday 1 March 2023**
>
>
>
> The Board and I very much look forward to welcoming and meeting with you
> during ICANN76 in Cancún, between 11-16 March. It is with great pleasure
> and excitement that we are finally going to Mexicó, after having had to
> cancel the in-person component of both ICANN67 and ICANN70. We are grateful
> to our friends and stakeholders in Latin America for their patience and
> understanding in the process, and delighted to say ¡ Cancún aquí vamos!
> (Cancún, here we are!).
>
>
>
> The last three years have certainly proven eventful for all of us, but in
> unison with ICANN organization, we are more determined than ever to work
> closely with you to make 2023 and the many years after that, productive and
> successful.
>
>
>
> This time in particular, the Board proposes a slight change in the
> approach to our bilateral sessions. We understood that there was an
> appetite for questions more tailored to each stakeholder group’s needs.
> Therefore, we will not be sending the same question from the Board to all
> of you. Having said this, to maintain our commitment to transparency, all
> of the questions the Board to sends to each group will be published in the
> Community Digest.
>
> The second improvement that we are putting in place starting at ICANN76,
> is to provide you with a summary of what we heard from you during these
> bilateral sessions. This summary will be in two forms:
>
> 1.       A blog highlighting key take aways from ICANN76 (and every ICANN
> meeting after that)
>
> 2.      Summaries of bilateral sessions will be included in the Policy
> Outcomes Report we publish after each ICANN meeting
>
>
>
> These are only initial steps, and we will continue to discuss with you
> ways improve the way we interact moving forward. In the meantime, please
> find herewith the questions we would like to ask *your* Group ahead of
> our joint session in Cancún:
>
>
>
> *The final SupPro report assigns resolution of many, potentially complex
> issues to the Implementation Review Team (IRT).  IRTs can - and sometimes
> have - become bottlenecks, for example, in connection with efforts to
> relitigate policy outcomes or where there are gaps in the policy being
> implemented.  What concrete steps can the board, org, or community (or all
> 3 collectively) take to improve the IRT process?  Please be as concrete as
> possible.*
>
>
>
> We look forward to hearing your thoughts on this soon.
>
>
>
> We would be grateful if you could send to Board Operations (
> board-ops-team at icann.org)  the questions you would like the Board to
> address during our face-to-face meetings. Given the finite time available
> for these meetings, please list your questions in order of priority. We
> would also appreciate getting your questions no later than *Wednesday 1
> March, 2023*.
>
>
>
> We thank you in advance for your time on this matter.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Tripti Sinha
>
> Chair, ICANN Board of Directors
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20230219/2e3fb574/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 44607 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20230219/2e3fb574/image001-0001.png>


More information about the council mailing list