[council] [Ext] Re: For your review - updated PDP Templates to facilitate consideration of impact on HR

Tomslin Samme-Nlar mesumbeslin at gmail.com
Tue May 16 09:46:06 UTC 2023


Thanks for the clarification, Marika.
That helps.

Warmly,
Tomslin

On Tue, 16 May 2023, 19:35 Marika Konings, <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:

> Thanks, Tomslin. As the Issue Report Request form goes to the GNSO Council
> for its consideration, the Council could decide to further consider this
> question at that point to see if it is possible to make a determination or
> gather further information. Alternatively, it could also decide to await
> the publication of the Issue Report, which is also expected to make this
> assessment, to determine what further steps, if any, may need to be taken,
> either in the form of information gathering or as part of the chartering of
> a working group that is expected to further consider the impact on HR of
> any recommendations that may come out of the process.
>
>
>
> In short, there is not one anticipated action, but something the Council
> will need to consider on a case by case basis.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 15 May 2023 at 21:00
> *To: *Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [council] For your review - updated PDP Templates to
> facilitate consideration of impact on HR
>
>
>
> Hi Marika,
>
>
>
> Thank you, this is great work by the CCOICI team.
>
>
>
> I only have a little question on the text put in the Issue Report Request
> form. Question 8 says: *8) Please indicate if consideration of the Issue
> is expected to have an impact on human rights 1 (Enter ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘not
> sure’, as applicable)*
>
>
>
> What is the anticipated action in a case where '*not sure*' is the answer
> to the question?
>
>
>
> Warmly,
>
> Tomslin
>
> @LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomslin/ [linkedin.com]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.linkedin.com/in/tomslin/__;!!PtGJab4!9AY5TIwpn3U6ebmDKJmth911uqFHrnOx_7y7gO65FaGpohuQdkYOj2llNdecIoD5YhqTLiw5V9xkK8Uq4IuEFv-pMG_HYso$>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 16 May 2023 at 02:18, Marika Konings via council <
> council at gnso.icann.org> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Following the Council’s adoption of the CCOICI’s WS2 Recommendations
> Report, the staff support team has worked on:
>
>
>
> *“In relation to 3 (Framework of Interpretation for Human Rights), the
> GNSO Council directs GNSO Staff Support to work on a proposed
> implementation of the recommendations, consulting relevant community
> experts as needed. This proposed implementation is to be reviewed and
> approved by the GNSO Council before implementation”;*
>
>
>
> As a result, you will find attached updated versions of:
>
>
>
>    - The request for an Issue Report template;
>    - The Preliminary Issue Report template (proposed updates on page 6-7);
>    - The PDP WG Charter Template (proposed updates on page 2-3), and;
>    - The PDP WG Initial Report template (proposed updates on page 7).
>
>
>
> Each of these documents have been updated with a set of check-list
> questions that, as recommended by the CCOIC would provide a lightweight
> mechanism to assess whether an impact to human rights is likely or expected
> as a result of the consideration of a specific topic and/or the related
> recommendations. Flagging potential impact on human rights at an early
> stage in the process will assist in focusing attention on this topic
> throughout the deliberations as well as allowing for a more detailed human
> rights impact assessment, if an impact is expected or established.
>
>
>
> As you may note, a link is provided to a resource page that is managed by
> ICANN org where additional materials are available that may aid both staff
> as well as community in its consideration of the potential impact on human
> rights (see https://community.icann.org/x/RAPCCw). As further materials
> are developed, for example, work is underway on an ICANN Learn training
> on inclusion which is expected to present examples of protected groups,
> these will get added.
>
>
>
> It is also important to keep in mind that these documents are templates –
> it does not prevent further elaboration and/or guidance if deemed necessary
> either by Council or community working groups.
>
>
>
> A special thanks to Ephraim Percy Kenyanito for the original input he
> provided to the CCOICI as well as his review of and feedback on these
> templates.
>
>
>
> Please provide any comments or suggestions you may have *by 7 June at the
> latest*. If additional time is needed, please do not hesitate to let us
> know as well.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Ariel, Julie and Marika
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20230516/b90bd46b/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list