<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Anne,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">You’re right, this table is no longer accurate (at least in so far as where the Board thinks things should trend towards). I had read your email briefly on my phone and had thought you were referring to the work plans/deliverables document.
As long as that one is accurate, I’m happy! I’ll sync up the documents when I have a moment.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does that help?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Steve<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 6:19 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, "Terri Agnew via cou." <council@gnso.icann.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Ext] Sub Pro Small Team Updated Chart - Question<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">HI Steve, <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regarding the attached updated Sub Pro Small Team chart, my understanding with respect to Recommendation 9.1 was that the Small Team is tasked initially with specifying that it is intended to apply to PICs/RVCs that are enforceable under
the current ByLaws.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I note the chart was not modified yet in this regard. Are you able to clarify this by reply? (It may be that this update is late-breaking after the meeting with Avri and Becky earlier this week.) <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anne<br clear="all">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anne Aikman-Scalese<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">GNSO Councilor <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:anneicanngnso@gmail.com" target="_blank">anneicanngnso@gmail.com</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>