[CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Questions --- where are the answers?

Wed Aug 22 01:10:16 UTC 2018

Dear all,

I have duly posted on the designated wiki page and will continue to do the
same, where feasible.

At the same time, as Marita and Maureen indicated, I have a Google Doc (a *word
doc*, not spreadsheet) to track all comments posted either by email or on
the wiki (and the original spreadsheet as far as I could establish))  (ps.
Yes, Maureen, it incorporates whatever email responses/threads which have
come to my attention and which I interpret as falling under a certain
section)

If folks prefer to use the wiki, then by all means do so. See:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88573813

If folks prefer to use a Google Doc then by all means do so on mine (link
is here
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rlGb86PXT50tYN33WHtwi94trFpoAoB6r63O_v6ATn0/edit?ts=5b7c758e#heading=h.xb0j1y6yfw28>,
suggest mode on). And if there's a section which you see on the  Annex C –
Table of Preliminary Recommendations, Options and Questions for Community
Input
<https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-initial-annex-c-02jul18-en.pdf>
which
you don't find on this Google Doc, it would be because I gathered from CPWG
calls that we don't think comment is needed on those. If you feel
otherwise, please get in touch with me and I can include a missing section
onto this Google Doc.

What I really care about is that we get more input.

Regards,

Justine Chew
-----

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 09:06, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
wrote:

> Agree Maureen - which is why I suggested that there is one please for all
> comments on the wiki - BUT THEN under that one heading - separate pages,
> one for each topic that we agreed we’d respond to.
>
> Yes, it’s big, but we need to make it easy for everyone to comment
>
> H
> On 22 Aug 2018, at 10:51 am, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately the wiki does not allow you to specify what you are actually
> commenting on.. when you have a big block of text. Unless you specify the
> actual recommendation you are referring to, among the thousands that they
> have.
>
> Whereas the google doc is organised into the proper sections with their
> related recommendations. And you only have to scroll down.
>
> It also allows you to enter comments that are specific to the text. or to
> write in the space given.
>
> Also, I presume Justine has added emails that relate to specific topics,
> to the relevant sections of  the google doc.
>
> Marita and i have responded on this doc which for me is easier because you
> can see clearly which sections I feel I can respond to.
>
> But we need more input by others. I am expecting RALO leaders as well as
> ALAC and other ALS and individual members to participate in this activity.
>
> This is a biggie for us, yet it is exactly the same community response we
> had when we first had to provide a comment on this activity, and I was only
> able to get one person per section  to help out.
>
> Pitiful.
>
> M
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Olivier - we need a good management of this issue.
>>
>> My preference (as usual) is that all comments should be in one place.
>> And my vote is for the wiki - since it is something we are all familiar
>> with and already part of the ICANN website.  And it may be an idea to split
>> the SubPro questions into different wiki pages since each topic includes
>> several questions by the SubPro group and it means less scrolling to come
>> to a topic.  My suggestion would be to have all comments on the wiki, with
>> a page listing each of the issues raised that we are commenting on, so
>> people can just click on the issue(s) they want to contribute to.
>>
>> Holly
>> On 22 Aug 2018, at 2:58 am, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am reading the comments/questions sent by each of the volunteers for
>> each section, especially all the ones which Justine has sent out -- on
>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88573813
>>
>> There are so many questions per section, I find it really difficult to
>> respond to them. I also responded to some of the same questions on the
>> Google Doc on
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1agNhbXfXLPQIRTGjC-8U-l534SWpbnsiapi-fi5mzFw/edit?usp=sharing
>> but I found that full spreadsheet way too overwhelming which is the reason
>> why I do not think many people contributed.
>>
>> We need to find a solution to this problem quickly.
>>
>> 1. do we create a separate WIKI page for each sub-section, with all the
>> questions for each section? Or
>> 2. do we create a survey for each sub-section, so people can answer the
>> questions simply and the collated responses would be easily accessed by the
>> penholders? Or
>> 3. do we create a separate Google Doc for each sub-section and people can
>> comment on it? Or
>> 4. do we use something else, another tool, another way to collect
>> responses?
>>
>> Or do we get each penholder to write a proposed text and then get a vote
>> going to find out the support for each of the responses given in the draft
>> by the penholder?
>>
>> I am asking this because time is ticking and I am *very* concerned about
>> the lack of progress at this stage to get a coordinated response out. So we
>> need to think creatively and we need to think fast.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> registration-issues-wg mailing list
>> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180822/d836c8d5/attachment.html>