[CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] Issue Brief Template

[Justine Chew]

Jonathan,

I agree with your approach and thank you for the initiative.

Since I am volunteering to co-penhold (unless no one else would like to
join me) for the comment to the New gTLD SubPro Supplemental Initial Report
of 1 Nov, I have, just prior to your email, developed a set of slides (with
ICANN branding even :) ) to help with the purpose you have described.  My
slides have a 'bit of colour' but given the way the SubPro Supplemental
Initial Report mirrors their earlier Initial Report in format (ie presents
specified preliminary recommendations - options - questions for which
feedback is requested) as opposed general request for comments, I would say
that 'bit of colour' is justified :)

Will share the slides via a separate email shortly. And hoping to see an
updated agenda soon.

Justine
-----


On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 05:10, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:

> Thanks Jonathan
>
> I may have been guilty of being a bit too much color in the past - and
> apologise.  The template is a great idea -  and I”m afraid you will have to
> be very firm in keeping us all to what it requires
>
> Holly
>
> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:45 AM, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>
> wrote:
>
> Folks,
> It’s become clear that we need to increase the efficiency of our CPWG
> meetings as basically the early topics are taking too much time and the
> later ones are given too little (and often too few participants!).  If
> you’ll indulge me, I’d like to draw metaphor to sports broadcasting where
> there are generally two people on the microphone: the play by play
> announcer (who explains what’s going on) and the “color” commentator (who
> attempts to explain the background and analysis of why). I believe we
> currently are engaged in far too much color and not enough play by play so
> I’ve created a PPT template to be used by whomever is invited to speak on a
> particular issue. I’m hoping that by following (or attempting to follow) as
> specific structure we get less rambling and storytelling and get to “the
> point” more quickly which is to get feedback on how the presenter should
> proceed in their endeavor whether it’s the drafting of a public comment or
> participation in a working group. This may seem harsh but please let’s give
> it a try so we can get the most out of these calls. Thanks!
> Jonathan
>
>
> Jonathan Zuck *|*  Executive Director  *|*  Innovators Network
> *jzuck at innovatorsnetwork.org <jzuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>* | O
> 202.420.7497 | S jvzuck |
> <image002.png>
>
> <Issue Brief.pptx><Issue Brief.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20181106/63661cd7/attachment-0001.html>