[CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] Fwd: [Policy] Chatham House publish a comment by Emily Taylor on WHOIS and GDPR

[Greg Shatan]

ICANN has responded (fairly strongly) to the NCSG letter that is the basis
for Milton’s post:
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/chalaby-to-badiei-perrin-20oct18-en.pdf.
Makes for some interesting reading.

I’m not sure the suspension of the PPSAI IRT is anything to celebrate. The
WG’s recommendations (which ultimately represented a broad consensus) were
adopted two years ago. It’s fairly pathetic that there’s even an IRT still
“deliberating” two years later. From a community perspective, there’s
nothing good in a failure to implement approved policy. Maybe there’s a
strong case for a short pause to see what adjustments might be needed, but
shelving this for a significant period of time, when there’s all sorts of
work to be done, isn’’t fair or appropriate

The need for P/P accreditation is at least as great now as before.
Privacy/proxy is not dead; it may even be more alive than ever. One
registrar has apparently put all of its registrants under its P/P
protection. If a party seeks registrant information, they are first
confronted with the P/P information. It they make a request from the P/P
provider and they are successful, they are provided with ... a dataset with
all of the contact information redacted due to GDPR. P/P issues tend to be
more prevalent with registrars who do not participate in ICANN; an
implemented policy is needed to reach them and get them to be “better
actors.”

Best regards,

Greg
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 7:32 PM Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Saw it before now.
>
> Um, maybe one point of light to celebraye. The P/P IRT has sensibly
> stopped its deliberations until.
>
> Carlton.
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, 11:43 am Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, <ocl at gih.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> so you've seen the paper from Emily Taylor (below) reflecting on progress
>> of the EPDP from one angle.
>>
>> Here's another angle from Milton Mueller, reflecting the points of view
>> held by the NCSG about the Unified Access Model:
>>
>> https://www.internetgovernance.org/2018/10/19/civil-society-groups-blast-icann-orgs-push-for-a-unified-access-model/
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>> On 20/10/2018 12:03, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond wrote:
>>
>> FYI - Emily Taylor is a participant in the EPDP.
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [Policy] Chatham House publish a comment by Emily Taylor on
>> WHOIS and GDPR
>> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:08:59 +0100
>> From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel at firsthand.net> <cdel at firsthand.net>
>> Reply-To: cdel at firsthand.net
>> To: policy at isoc-e.org <policy at isoc-e.org> <policy at isoc-e.org>
>>
>> https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/why-public-directory-domain-names-about-vanish
>>
>> --
>> Christian de Larrinaga
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policy mailing listPolicy at lists.isoc-e.orghttp://lists.isoc-e.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/policy
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> registration-issues-wg mailing list
>> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20181020/17eb080f/attachment.html>