[CPWG] EPDP: Geographic distinction
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Oct 30 01:32:34 UTC 2018
GDPR is applicable to residents of the EU by companies resident there
and worldwide.
One of the issues is whether contracted parties should be allowed or
required to distinguish between those who are resident there and elsewhere.
There is agreement that such distinction should be allowed, but EPDP
is divided on whether it should be required. The GAC/BC/IPC want to
see the distinction made, and at least one very large contracted
party does already make the distinction. Other contracted parties are
pushing back VERY strongly saying that there is virtually no way that
the can or are willing to make the distinction.
The current (confusing) state of the working document is attached.
Which side should ALAC come down on?
- Restrict application to those to whom GDPR applies?
- Apply universally ignoring residence?
As usual, quick replies requested.
Alan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RySG revisions Small Team #2 Geographic - updated.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 80885 bytes
Desc: RySG revisions Small Team #2 Geographic - updated.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20181030/482725bf/RySGrevisionsSmallTeam2Geographic-updated-0001.pdf>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list