[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] Next possible move related to GDPR

Jonathan Zuck JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org
Mon Sep 3 14:56:45 UTC 2018


So we all agree we need a “balanced” position. What does that mean in practice. I think Alan has suggested we “balance” our position based on two criteria:


  1.  Majority vs Minority interests
  2.  Majority vs Minority representation on the EPDP

Tijani if you have a framework to propose, please do so. Thanks.
Jonathan


From: GTLD-WG <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> On Behalf Of Tijani BEN JEMAA
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 8:29 AM
To: Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org>
Cc: CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [GTLD-WG] [CPWG] Next possible move related to GDPR

Fully agree with you that the full story is much more nuanced and that an imbalanced view of an issue that requires a reasonable understanding of the various viewpoints is not particularly helpful.
As the author says nothing about the legitimate positive uses that WHOIS data is put to, but only mentions the inappropriate uses, there are in our group those who say nothing about the inappropriate uses of WHOIS data, but only mention the legitimate positive uses.

What I said since the beginning is that we need a well balanced position as defenders of the end users’ interest, all end users As we have to prevent criminals from harming the end users, we also need to prevent other kind of criminals from using end users data for their own (illegal) interest.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
             +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Le 3 sept. 2018 à 04:14, Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org<mailto:greg at isoc-ny.org>> a écrit :
>
> As Alan notes, this is one person's view of the context, seen from a rather
> particular point of view.  Facts are included and excluded quite
> selectively.  It's particularly silly to call those who disagree with the
> author's point of view "privacy opponents" -- just as it would be silly to
> call those who agree with the author's point of view "privacy fetishists"
> or "privacy maximalists."  But I guess a story needs good guys and bad guys
> need to be called things like "privacy opponents" and "copyright
> maximalists."
>
> The blog post says nothing about the legitimate positive uses that WHOIS
> data is put to, but only mentions the inappropriate uses.  It then makes
> very simplistic statements about the effect that withholding that data has
> had, which fundamentally miscast the positions of those on the "other side"
> from the author.  The full story is much more nuanced.  An imbalanced view
> of an issue that requires a reasonable understanding of the various
> viewpoints is not particularly helpful. Of course, there's a place for
> advocacy, but it should be recognized as such.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Greg
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 1:43 AM Kan Kaili <kankaili at gmail.com<mailto:kankaili at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Marita.  Very informative background.
>>
>> Kaili
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: Marita Moll
>>  To: cpwg at icann.org<mailto:cpwg at icann.org>
>>  Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 3:00 AM
>>  Subject: Re: [CPWG] Next possible move related to GDPR
>>
>>
>>  Some context for the attached draft circulated by Alan:
>>
>>
>> https://www.internetgovernance.org/2018/08/29/special-interests-push-u-s-congress-to-override-icanns-whois-policy-process/
>>
>>
>>  Marita
>>
>>
>>  On 8/29/2018 2:47 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>
>>    Not of direct relevance to our work, but perhaps interesting.
>>
>>    Alan
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  CPWG mailing list
>>  CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
>>  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> GTLD-WG mailing list
>> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>>
>> Working Group direct URL:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Shatan
> greg at isoc-ny.org<mailto:greg at isoc-ny.org>
>
> "The Internet is for everyone"
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
>
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________
GTLD-WG mailing list
GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg

Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20180903/5c39557a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CPWG mailing list