[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] EPDP Answer omissions?

[Vanda Etges]

I understand these are legal issues to be dealing among parties under GDPR. 

Vanda Scartezini
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for typos 

> On 6 Jan 2019, at 17:51, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> 
> There have been questions asked as to why we omitted replying to 
> certain questions in the EPDP response (in particular Recs 13, 14 and 21).
> 
> This was not an error, but intentional. The Recs were in relation to 
> Data Processing roles and responsibilities, the classification of who 
> is the "controller" under GDPR, and what formal agreements need to be 
> in place between the various contracted parties and ICANN. The answer 
> is that we did not think that these issues had specific relevancy to 
> Individual users nor did we have the legal expertise to contribute 
> strong arguments.
> 
> Alan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> GTLD-WG mailing list
> GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
> 
> Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs