[CPWG] Fwd: IRP-IOT selection/ "vetting" process
Marita Moll
mmoll at ca.inter.net
Fri Jul 5 16:35:07 UTC 2019
There is a fair bit of discussion going on in NCSG re: this letter
announcing that the board will vet participation in one of the current
accountability mechanisms -- questions are around is this appropriate,
is it even legal?
Should we be discussing this as well? The letter was sent by Leon as
chair of the Board Accountability Cttee to all community leaders. See
link below.
Marita
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: IRP-IOT selection/ "vetting" process
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:09:39 -0400
From: Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix <rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM>
Reply-To: Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix <rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM>
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Hi all
Starting this as a separate thread as I think it is an important
discussion to have.
As a relative newcomer, I'm mostly interested in knowing how often has
the Board undertaken such a vetting process for participation in any
form of PDP (taken broadly).
That an SO/AC chooses its own people is one thing, but here the Board
has, in effect, the last say.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: *farzaneh badii* <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>
Date: Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Call for volunteers IRP-IOT and proposed Council
endorsement process
To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>>
Thanks Rafik
I have to say I am stunned by the board decision to be involved in
vetting the applicants for IOT membership. This is the group that is
going to come up with procedures to hold the board accountable. Board
decided to have a say in the selection? This is astonishing. I don't
know how the board doesn't see what is wrong with such involvement.
If NCSG agrees we need to send a formal letter to the board and remind
them what IOT is for!
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 3:54 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
For those interested to volunteer to IRP-IOT please review carefully
the call here
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-to-siddiqui-et-al-26jun19-en.pdf [icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_sanchez-2Dto-2Dsiddiqui-2Det-2Dal-2D26jun19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=nB8wjB51BCGkGoYf3d1QMu8BvYola3KUSkUARFf64_Q&s=O4k5PeksbH8PKBf9gPIeTNc6uFW4qxu6BXOVz-IIlyM&e=> and
if you would like to get GNSO council support read the details below.
Best regards,
Rafik
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Dear Council Members, SG/C Chairs,
As you may be aware, the ICANN Board Accountability Mechanisms
Committee (BAMC) recently launched a call for volunteers to
recompose the Independent Review Process (IRP) Implementation
Oversight Team (IOT) (see
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-to-siddiqui-et-al-26jun19-en.pdf [icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_sanchez-2Dto-2Dsiddiqui-2Det-2Dal-2D26jun19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=nB8wjB51BCGkGoYf3d1QMu8BvYola3KUSkUARFf64_Q&s=O4k5PeksbH8PKBf9gPIeTNc6uFW4qxu6BXOVz-IIlyM&e=>)
. The letter also notes that ‘if any SO/AC wishes to vet candidates
through its own candidate selection process, the BAMC welcomes that
work, diligence, and indication of support when passing the
candidate further into the process’.
As during recent discussions, Council members as well as GNSO
community members have highlighted the importance of this process
and the need for the GNSO to contribute candidates with expertise to
this process, Council leadership would like to propose the following
steps:
1. Any candidates interested in GNSO Council endorsement should
send their Expressions of Interest describing how his or her
experience aligns with the skills identified, as well as a
commitment to the estimated time demands to gnso-secs at icann.org
<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org> by Friday 12 July 2019.
2. Council leadership will evaluate the applications against the
skills and experience outlined in the call for volunteers (see
also below).
3. Council leadership will share with the Council the proposed
candidates for GNSO Council endorsement by 17 July 2019 at the
latest.
4. Council to consider proposed candidates for endorsement during
18 July 2019 GNSO Council meeting.
5. GNSO Secretariat to submit EOIs of endorsed candidates by 31
July 2019 at the latest.
6. All the EOIs of the candidates that meet the qualifications will
be provided to the BAMC for evaluation and identification of new
members.
If you have any questions or concerns about this proposed process,
please let us know as soon as possible. We appreciate that the
timeline is short, but we hope this will not prevent you from
encouraging members who have the required skills and experience from
applying. To be clear, nothing prevents those not seeking GNSO
Council endorsement from submitting their applications directly to
the BAMC.
With best regards,
Pam Little and Rafik Dammak, Vice Chairs, GNSO Council
On behalf of GNSO Council Leadership
From
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-to-siddiqui-et-al-26jun19-en.pdf
[icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_sanchez-2Dto-2Dsiddiqui-2Det-2Dal-2D26jun19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=nB8wjB51BCGkGoYf3d1QMu8BvYola3KUSkUARFf64_Q&s=O4k5PeksbH8PKBf9gPIeTNc6uFW4qxu6BXOVz-IIlyM&e=>
*Skills and Experience Required *
The IOT has very important work remaining, including the
finalization of a set of Updated Supplementary Procedures that will
define the conduct of IRPs and assure that the purposes of the IRP
are upheld. These Procedures must also align with principles of
international arbitration. As a result, those members of our
community that you identify and encourage to join the IOT, should
have the necessary legal or judicial skills and experience in
disputes such as IRPs, arbitrations, or other alternate dispute
resolution processes. Specific familiarity with ICANN’s
accountability mechanisms is another important skill that we hope to
see amongst new members. No single candidate must bring all of this
experience, but as we look at the IOT as a whole, we are striving
for a variety of experiences that, taken together, make the IOT
well-suited to finalize a set of procedures to conduct IRP
proceedings. IOT members must also have the time and availability to
attend at least a one hour call each week to participate on IOT
telephonic meetings, as well as sufficient availability to
contribute to the work online.
--
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20190705/f506d7b6/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list