[CPWG] Fwd: IRP-IOT selection/ "vetting" process
Marita Moll
mmoll at ca.inter.net
Fri Jul 5 19:14:47 UTC 2019
Thanks Maureen. I am pretty much of a newbie on the intricacies involved
here, but if it is about accountability mechanisms, on the surface, it
feels a little like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. I know
board members do not represent the interests of various constituencies,
but there it would be hoped that there is an affinity. And we have only
one defined seat on this board.
Maybe we could invite Leon to speak to us about this at a CPWG call and
explain how it is not a fox/henhouse scenario.
Marita
On 7/5/2019 3:00 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
> Hi Marita
>
> Apologies I received the letter from Leon, as the Chair of the BAMC
> (Board Accountability Mechanisms Committee) on the 26 June - right in
> the middle of the Marrakech meeting and it got pushed to the back
> burner and was then difficult to find because the letter was in an
> email sent by a staff member. But it is attached below.
>
> Personally I can't see the problem of the BAMC selecting the members
> for the actual committee - they only want a limited sized group and a
> balance of skills. Others candidates who are proposed by their SO/ACs
> but not selected as members can remain on the committee as observers
> (and don't vote).
>
> Maureen
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 6:35 AM Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net
> <mailto:mmoll at ca.inter.net>> wrote:
>
> There is a fair bit of discussion going on in NCSG re: this letter
> announcing that the board will vet participation in one of the
> current accountability mechanisms -- questions are around is this
> appropriate, is it even legal?
>
> Should we be discussing this as well? The letter was sent by Leon
> as chair of the Board Accountability Cttee to all community
> leaders. See link below.
>
> Marita
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: IRP-IOT selection/ "vetting" process
> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:09:39 -0400
> From: Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix <rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM>
> <mailto:rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM>
> Reply-To: Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
> <rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM> <mailto:rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM>
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
> Starting this as a separate thread as I think it is an important
> discussion to have.
>
> As a relative newcomer, I'm mostly interested in knowing how often
> has the Board undertaken such a vetting process for participation
> in any form of PDP (taken broadly).
>
> That an SO/AC chooses its own people is one thing, but here the
> Board has, in effect, the last say.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *farzaneh badii* <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
> <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>
> Date: Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 3:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [council] Call for volunteers IRP-IOT and proposed
> Council endorsement process
> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>>
>
>
> Thanks Rafik
>
> I have to say I am stunned by the board decision to be involved in
> vetting the applicants for IOT membership. This is the group that
> is going to come up with procedures to hold the board accountable.
> Board decided to have a say in the selection? This is astonishing.
> I don't know how the board doesn't see what is wrong with such
> involvement.
>
> If NCSG agrees we need to send a formal letter to the board and
> remind them what IOT is for!
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 3:54 PM Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For those interested to volunteer to IRP-IOT please review
> carefully the call here
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-to-siddiqui-et-al-26jun19-en.pdf [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_sanchez-2Dto-2Dsiddiqui-2Det-2Dal-2D26jun19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=nB8wjB51BCGkGoYf3d1QMu8BvYola3KUSkUARFf64_Q&s=O4k5PeksbH8PKBf9gPIeTNc6uFW4qxu6BXOVz-IIlyM&e=> and
> if you would like to get GNSO council support read the details
> below.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rafik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>
> Dear Council Members, SG/C Chairs,
>
> As you may be aware, the ICANN Board Accountability Mechanisms
> Committee (BAMC) recently launched a call for volunteers to
> recompose the Independent Review Process (IRP) Implementation
> Oversight Team (IOT) (see
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-to-siddiqui-et-al-26jun19-en.pdf [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_sanchez-2Dto-2Dsiddiqui-2Det-2Dal-2D26jun19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=nB8wjB51BCGkGoYf3d1QMu8BvYola3KUSkUARFf64_Q&s=O4k5PeksbH8PKBf9gPIeTNc6uFW4qxu6BXOVz-IIlyM&e=>)
> . The letter also notes that ‘if any SO/AC wishes to vet
> candidates through its own candidate selection process, the
> BAMC welcomes that work, diligence, and indication of support
> when passing the candidate further into the process’.
>
> As during recent discussions, Council members as well as GNSO
> community members have highlighted the importance of this
> process and the need for the GNSO to contribute candidates
> with expertise to this process, Council leadership would like
> to propose the following steps:
>
> 1. Any candidates interested in GNSO Council endorsement
> should send their Expressions of Interest describing how
> his or her experience aligns with the skills identified,
> as well as a commitment to the estimated time demands to
> gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org> by Friday
> 12 July 2019.
> 2. Council leadership will evaluate the applications against
> the skills and experience outlined in the call for
> volunteers (see also below).
> 3. Council leadership will share with the Council the
> proposed candidates for GNSO Council endorsement by 17
> July 2019 at the latest.
> 4. Council to consider proposed candidates for endorsement
> during 18 July 2019 GNSO Council meeting.
> 5. GNSO Secretariat to submit EOIs of endorsed candidates by
> 31 July 2019 at the latest.
> 6. All the EOIs of the candidates that meet the
> qualifications will be provided to the BAMC for evaluation
> and identification of new members.
>
> If you have any questions or concerns about this proposed
> process, please let us know as soon as possible. We appreciate
> that the timeline is short, but we hope this will not prevent
> you from encouraging members who have the required skills and
> experience from applying. To be clear, nothing prevents those
> not seeking GNSO Council endorsement from submitting their
> applications directly to the BAMC.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Pam Little and Rafik Dammak, Vice Chairs, GNSO Council
>
> On behalf of GNSO Council Leadership
>
>
> From
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sanchez-to-siddiqui-et-al-26jun19-en.pdf
> [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_correspondence_sanchez-2Dto-2Dsiddiqui-2Det-2Dal-2D26jun19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=nB8wjB51BCGkGoYf3d1QMu8BvYola3KUSkUARFf64_Q&s=O4k5PeksbH8PKBf9gPIeTNc6uFW4qxu6BXOVz-IIlyM&e=>
>
> *Skills and Experience Required *
>
> The IOT has very important work remaining, including the
> finalization of a set of Updated Supplementary Procedures that
> will define the conduct of IRPs and assure that the purposes
> of the IRP are upheld. These Procedures must also align with
> principles of international arbitration. As a result, those
> members of our community that you identify and encourage to
> join the IOT, should have the necessary legal or judicial
> skills and experience in disputes such as IRPs, arbitrations,
> or other alternate dispute resolution processes. Specific
> familiarity with ICANN’s accountability mechanisms is another
> important skill that we hope to see amongst new members. No
> single candidate must bring all of this experience, but as we
> look at the IOT as a whole, we are striving for a variety of
> experiences that, taken together, make the IOT well-suited to
> finalize a set of procedures to conduct IRP proceedings. IOT
> members must also have the time and availability to attend at
> least a one hour call each week to participate on IOT
> telephonic meetings, as well as sufficient availability to
> contribute to the work online.
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
> list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
> Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
> delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
> and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20190705/7e4f26ec/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list