[CPWG] At-Large CPWG Pro... - This a process for everything we do, ...
Satish Babu (Google Docs)
comments-noreply at docs.google.com
Thu Oct 10 02:58:50 UTC 2019
Satish Babu replied to a comment in the following document
At-Large CPWG Process for Comment
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/13EjNxqfOvXGToCWLZi9-crsUSKvqnfdW57JF9drhPO4/edit?disco=AAAADbm3AXI&ts=5d9e9e6a&usp=comment_email_document&usp_dm=false)
Eduardo Diaz
This a process for everything we do, however, in the context of the CPWG
the process should be narrowed in scope to policy issues only.
So, if this graphic is going to be part of the charter I suggest that it
shows only that part that pertains to the CPWG scope which is policy.
Bastiaan Goslings
This whole diagram looks to me like a detailed description of the 'Develop
position/action in the '3. CPWG Ingest process' funnel. If so maybe an
explicit referral would help to avoid confusion.
Maureen Hilyard
This provides good guidance for the development of how the CPWG (and its
charter) fits into the At-Large PDP process. I like the expectation of
involvement of the RALOs
Ricardo Holmquist
I have a "trouble" with this graphic, for me some of the steps are in
parallel, not one after the other. For example, the RALO part does not need
to be after the Penholder or the CPWG Discuss, hence narrowing its
discussion, when a RALO might have a opposite position or a different
view. As for the question of Ed, this graphic needs to be in conjuction
with the inverted pyramid where his comment is included.
Nadira Al Araj
Yes, RALOS 3 boxes can be replaced by one box that says something in this
regards:
(RALOs are encouraged to respond to surveys developed by CPWG)
DC Dogs
I think the manner and circumstances in which we involve the RALOs will
continue to evolve so it's meant to be general at the moment. It might be
surveys or it might just be the active participation of RALO leaders.
Satish Babu
I think we should consider "end-users" as part of the diagram (and not stop
at RALOs). Our real target group is the end-user community, but they are
out of the chart...we should probably modify the RALO box(es) to include
end-users as well.
Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
You have received this email because you are a participant in this thread.
Change () what Google sends you.
You cannot reply to this email. View At-Large CPWG Process for Comment
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/13EjNxqfOvXGToCWLZi9-crsUSKvqnfdW57JF9drhPO4/edit?disco=AAAADbm3AXI&usp=comment_email_discussion&usp_dm=false&ts=5d9e9e6a)
to reply.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20191009/d1239aed/attachment.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list