[CPWG] Calif. AG mentions ALAC advice in note to ICANN re: PIR

[Roberto Gaetano]

The conclusion, quoted from the document:

Given the concerns stated above, and based on the information provided, the .ORG registry and the global Internet community – of which innumerable Californians are a part – are better served if ICANN withholds approval of the proposed sale and transfer of PIR and the .ORG registry to the private equity firm Ethos Capital.

More than just the reference to our document, I would add that reading the argumentation by the Ca. AG agrees with some of the points we have raised.

R.


On 18.04.2020, at 03:44, Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net<mailto:mmoll at ca.inter.net>> wrote:

Wow, quite a slap down by the AG of California.  ALAC advice re: this issue referenced as reasons for concern.

Marita

<becerra-to-botterman-marby-15apr20-en.pdf>_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200418/7e96e854/attachment.html>