[CPWG] PIC commitments on ORG

[Evan Leibovitch]

Yecch. PICDRPs. I can't think of one instance in which they've sided with
interveners in previous cases, and they're not exactly chosen because of
sensitivity to the public interest.
Depending on that process is essentially a free pass for Ethos.

- Evan


On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 13:27, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>
wrote:

> Agree Evan. Take a look at the document as it says explicitly the “or
> else” can include taking .ORG away from PIR and that the stewardship
> council has veto power over policies in those areas.  It’s not bad language
> in that respect.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200221/6db77587/attachment.html>