[CPWG] PIR sale…

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 20, 2020, at 5:44 PM, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:
> This email also prompted the NRO to assure me that it was completely organic, which it obviously was not. Again, not crying foul here. Always just curious.

I’m not sure what the implication is?  Amy, who I wasn’t previously aware of, is a constituent of the Empowered Community, as everyone is.  Someone has to call the process into action, if it’s going to be called into action.  It’s not defined as something with specific triggers, it has to be called into action to function.  Who pulls the trigger is irrelevant, no?  What matters is what happens next, and we’re now a week from ICANN’s deadline to respond, and all they’ve done thus far is whine that they don’t understand why they’re being asked to.  Which is a pretty weak-ass response to being asked for something by your regulatory oversight.  Still, they have another week to make good on it, and a board meeting in the mean-time, so I can be patient and wait and see what they come up with.

                                -Bill

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200120/eeb4cddb/signature.asc>