[CPWG] GAC ICANN68 Communique

[Greg Shatan]

I think the only groups that are happy with the EPDP process are the
Contracted Parties and the NCSG.  SSAC, ALAC, GAC and CSG (or at least BC &
IPC) are all various shades of unhappy.  I assume ccNSO and ASO just don't
care...?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
*Greg Shatan | President, ISOC-NY*
greg at isoc-ny.org


*"The Internet is for everyone"*


On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:37 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
wrote:

> Correct. I sent a link to the CPWG on 14 May. The document can be found at
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-111-en.pdf.
>
> Alan
>
>
> At 2020-06-29 07:25 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
>
> The other interesting document is SAC 111.  They are VERY unhappy with the
> EPDP process and strong on both the accuracy and legal vs natural issues.
>
> Holly
>
> > On Jun 30, 2020, at 3:20 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> > <ICANN68+GAC+Communique.pdf>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200629/3946937d/attachment.html>