[CPWG] About Single Subject Meetings

[Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society]

The work the TTF has put in reviewing and documenting this
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48348446/How%20At-Large%20should%20use%20group%20chat-2017.pdf

The slack room using the free tier has been setup in 2014(!) and first used
during ATLAS II

 here’s an invite to the icannatlarge.slack.com

https://join.slack.com/t/icannatlarge/shared_invite/zt-5r6y60n5-rYNL4Dq15L3elsHgnQpLgw

we can use the free tier (and we could apply for non profit pricing - as I
recall you pointed that out at the TTF session at ICANN60 as my last TTF
meeting as chair)

Shrug, we just need to do - just like we switched from adobe connect to
zoom and at large staff to run the invites. The free tier is bette than the
Skype chat

Dev Anand



On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 10:20 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well, good to know the path is identified.
>
> Given the volume of work being done and the genuine need to prevent
> volunteer exhaustion, can the case be re-made? Or is it a dead end? Not
> quite fair that ICANN deems it suitable for staff but not the rest of the
> community.
>
>
> - Evan
> On May 21, 2020, 8:23 PM -0400, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>,
> wrote:
>
> Ha ha! Welcome to the party. The TTF have been trying to get Slack support
> for years! I tried for just the CCTRT and failed and ICANN staff actually
> USE it. Sigh.
>
> Jonathan Zuck
> Executive Director
> Innovators Network Foundation
> www.InnovatorsNetwork.org
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Evan Leibovitch <
> evanleibovitch at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2020 5:20:59 PM
> *To:* Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
> *Cc:* CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [CPWG] About Single Subject Meetings
>
> Much as I usually loathe solving human problems with tech solutions, this
> may be an appropriate time to suggest such a path.
>
> I hated Slack(*)... until I was forced to use it regularly in some
> organizations in which I participate. It acts like a Skype that's fine
> tuned to organizational use with easy creation of ad hoc subgroups and the
> ability for participants to come and go at their own pace. Furthermore,
> real time chat now is great for diverse time zones and handles threads
> better than email. When properly used, chats can be where the preparatory
> work is done, leaving calls for decision making and when diversity of
> feedback is more important than focus.
>
> - Evan
>
> (*) while I have a Slack account for some orgs, my day job uses an open
> source Slack workalike called Mattermost. Other options such as Telegram
> and Microsoft Teams also exist. What I mean is that I'm suggesting more use
> of an organizational chat system but am not trying to push any one version
> or vendor.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200522/1bcc4a64/attachment.html>