[CPWG] [GNSO-TPR] RrSG survey re: domain locks

[Steinar Grøtterød]

Dear Gopal,

When present at the TRP PDP WG meeting, the RrSG presentation by Owen Smigelski did not include the data where the registrar's size was selected in the response categories. However, Owen stated that " I was not able to find any correlation between either registrar size or type and the preferred lock period".

In regard to your question about registrars number of domain names: I do not have this information, but assume that Owen selected based on the RrSG fee structure.

In my opinion, the "surveys" RrSG and CPWG) only indicate a difference in the questions about locks where CPWG were more in favor of removing locks, Registrars more in favor of keeping. But none of the groups cannot be seen to have consensus.

Regards,

Steinar Grøtterød

On 05/12/2021, 14:43, "gopal at annauniv.edu" <gopal at annauniv.edu> wrote:

    Daer Dr. Steinar Grøtterød,

    Hope you will have time to discuss the tabulated data in the next CPWG 
    Meeting.

    Quick Note: It has been nicely noted that 30 day + 60 day = 61.9% which 
    is good news.

    I have been reading the Regostrar Domains Under Management [DUM] 
    tabulated data as:

    Group A:

    0-5,000 : Zero to 30 Days          - Attention

    Group B

    5,001 - 50,000 7 days 60 days
    5,001 - 50,000 24 hours 24 hours

    Group C:

    50,001 - 100,000 60 days 60 days

    Group D: Has the maximum 7 Subgroups

    100,001 - 999,999 30 days 30 days
    100,001 - 999,999 60 days 60 days
    100,001 - 999,999 60 days 30 days
    100,001 - 999,999 No lock No lock   - Attention
    100,001 - 999,999 No lock 24 hours
    100,001 - 999,999 60 days 30 days
    100,001 - 999,999 60 days 60 days

    Group E: 60 Days is not seen here !!!

    1-5 million No lock No lock   - Attention
    1-5 million 30 days 7 days
    1-5 million 15 days 15 days
    1-5 million 30 days 30 days

    Group F:

    5 million + 60 days 30 days
    5 million + 60 days 60 days
    5 million + 60 days 30 days
    5 million + No lock No lock   - Attention
    5 million + 30 days 30 days

    Into which group do the following top Domain Registrars given below 
    belong to ?

    Domain.com
    Namecheap
    Bluehost
    HostGator
    Google Domains
    Hover
    GoDaddy
    Name.com
    Hostinger
    DreamHost
    HostPapa
    NameSilo
    Dynadot

    How many hazards did each group manage ?

    It has been nicely noted that 30 day + 60 day = 61.9% which is good 
    news.

    In any case, I stand by the "worst - case design of 60 days" that is 
    fully backed by
    the history.

    Hope such an anaylsis can happen some time as we move on with 60 days.

    Sincerely,




    Gopal T V
    0 9840121302
    https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545
    https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Dr. T V Gopal
    Professor
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering
    College of Engineering
    Anna University
    Chennai - 600 025, INDIA
    Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340
           (Res) 24454753
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    On 2021-12-04 13:11, Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG wrote:
    > Hi,
    > 
    > Attached is the Registrar survey connected to the inter-registrar 60
    > days lock questions.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Steinar Grøtterød
    > 
    > On 03/12/2021, 20:54, "GNSO-TPR on behalf of Owen Smigelski via
    > GNSO-TPR" <gnso-tpr-bounces at icann.org on behalf of gnso-tpr at icann.org>
    > wrote:
    > 
    >     Hi all,
    > 
    >     Attached is the document I shared during Tuesday’s meeting
    > regarding RrSG member feedback regarding domain name locks at creation
    > and transfer. As requested, I added a breakdown by registrar type and
    > size. I was not able to find any correlation between either registrar
    > size or type and the preferred lock period.
    > 
    >     Please let me know if you have any questions.
    > 
    >     Regards,
    > 
    >     Owen
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > CPWG mailing list
    > CPWG at icann.org
    > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
    > your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
    > accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
    > (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
    > Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman
    > link above to change your membership status or configuration,
    > including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling
    > delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.