[CPWG] Transfer Policy Review Team: Question about the 60-days lock
Theo Geurts
atlarge at dcx.nl
Wed Nov 10 12:22:43 UTC 2021
Compliance showed us the number of complaints regarding unauthorized transfers yesterday. The numbers were low ranging from 1-20 a month, with little to no indication of real domain name hijacks.
Account control panel compromises (a strong indicator) were absent for most of the months.
Average domain transfers are around 400.000-500.000 a month.
Best.
Theo
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Theo Geurts wrote:
> Compliance showed us the number of complaints regarding unauthorized transfers yesterday. The numbers were low ranging from 1-20 a month, with little to no indication of real domain name hijacks.
>
> Account control panel compromises (a strong indicator) were absent for most of the months.
>
> Average domain transfers are around 400.000-500.000 a month.
>
> Best.
> Theo
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight via CPWG wrote:
>> I’d recommend you read the SSAC papers on hijacks as well as some of the background materials for previous IRTP PDPs
>>
>> A lot of the locks that exist at the moment are due to past experience ie. Domains being hijacked etc.,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mr Michele Neylon
>> Blacknight Solutions
>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>> https://www.blacknight.com/
>> https://blacknight.blog/
>> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
>> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
>> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
>> -------------------------------
>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>>
>>
>> *From: *CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, 9 November 2021 at 17:45
>> *To: *CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[CPWG] Transfer Policy Review Team: Question about the 60-days lock
>> *[EXTERNAL EMAIL]* Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> At the TPR WG Meeting on Nov 9, 2021, the 60-days locks were discussed. The present policy – and the majority of Registry Operators, have a 60-days transfer lock after the initial registration of a domain name AND a 60-days lock after a successful inter-registrar transfer.
>>
>> Based on the discussion in the TPR WG, I would like to hear the CPWG opinion by asking the following:
>>
>> 1. Are we in favor of keeping the 60-days lock after the initial registration of a domain name?
>> 2. Are we in favor of keeping the 60-days lock after a successful transfer of a domain name?
>> 3. Could the above be optional?
>> 4. Should the Registrant has the option to opt-out?
>>
>> I did not have the time to discuss this with the At-Large TPR members and observers, hence will not ask for a poll. But hopefully CPWG can express their view at the CPWG call on Nov 10, 2021.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Steinar Grøtterød
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20211110/2237e3ea/attachment.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list