[CPWG] ICANN position on the Facebook outage

[lists at christopherwilkinson.eu]

I agree with Olivier's suggestion.

CW

> On 6 Oct 2021, at 18:15, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> IMHO a blog post by OCTO would suffice. It could even point at the Cloudflare explanation.
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> On 06/10/2021 17:43, John McCormac via CPWG wrote:
>> The problem with Facebook was self inflicted. Perhaps the simplest solution for ICANN would be a one page text with a graphic explaining that Facebook (or other large company) is not the Internet. 
>> 
>> The discussion on today's call seemed like a kind of regulatory overreach with a desire to have ICANN tell large companies how to construct their own network architecture. This really is not an ICANN issue. 
>> 
>> For those who haven't seen it yet, the CloudFlare blog post on what happened with Facebook is worth reading: 
>> 
>> https://blog.cloudflare.com/october-2021-facebook-outage/ <https://blog.cloudflare.com/october-2021-facebook-outage/> 
>> 
>> Regards...jmcc 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20211009/eb8b84ee/attachment.html>