[CPWG] Accuracy Scoping Team - Questions for ICANN Org

[Jothan Frakes]

It was an image, which is why you were unable to copy/paste.  I manually
re-typed it from the image (included) and added %'s below.

What I am truly curious about it what the % of these per category were
where the request was insufficient, invalid, misdirected, etc.

Reporter Type for Registration Data Inaccuracy
1308
Reporter Type Total
% of Total
Authorized Representative 33 2.52%
Information Security Researcher 78 5.96%
ICANN Compliance 15 1.15%
IP Lawyer/Brand Protection 135 10.32%
LEA, Consumer Protection, Gov or DPA 10 0.76%
NGO 0 0.00%
Other 860 65.75%
Registrant - Current 107 8.18%
Registrant - Former 56 4.28%
Registrar 4 0.31%
Reseller 2 0.15%
UDRP/URS - Complainant 3 0.23%
UDRP/URS - Provider 4 0.31%
UDRP/URS - Respondent 1 0.08%
[image: image.png]


-Jothan


On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:17 AM Roberto Gaetano via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I had a look at the table on page 4, that I tried without success to paste
> in this email.
> It looks that about 10% of the cases have been reported by IP
> (intellectual property, not internet protocol), which make sense, about 12%
> by the registrant, which seems low, but what really puzzles me is the 60+%
> of “others”. Since this is by far the largest group, it would be nice to
> have an idea of what type of reporters it might include.
>
> I understand that this field is selected by the complainant, probably with
> a drop-down menu, or other way, but would it not be interesting to provide,
> instead of the “Other” option, a blank field to be filled in (or a blank
> field prompted when the “Other” option is selected?
>
> Thanks,
> Roberto
>
>
>
> On 19.01.2022, at 02:42, Alan Greenberg via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org> wrote:
>
> The Accuracy Scoping team submitted 25 questions to ICANN Org. and we have
> now received the responses. They are attached here.
>
> This will be BRIEFLY presented on the meeting this week, but not in any
> detail.
>
> If anyone has any comments or follow-up questions, please let me know.
>
> Alan<ICANN_Org Responses.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20220119/2ec187f7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 67932 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20220119/2ec187f7/image-0001.png>