[CPWG] Suggested reading: "Hegemonic practices in multistakeholder Internet governance: Participatory evangelism, quiet politics, and glorification of status quo at ICANN meetings"

[Bill Jouris]

Hi Evan, 
I would be interested to know who you think At Large *should* be accountable to.  And, especially if it as global a group as I expect, how you envision doing selection involving that group.   I don't disagree with the goal of At Large being more broadly accountable to those whose interests we are trying to champion.  But I'm not seeing a realistic way to make it happen.  Perhaps that's merely a failure of imagination on my part.  But I'd like to see a concrete proposal for something different and visibly better before deciding we must junk what we have at the moment. 
Regards,  
Bill Jouris 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:11 AM, Evan Leibovitch via CPWG<cpwg at icann.org> wrote:   _______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20230420/8ffe60ed/attachment-0001.html>